The Goldilocks Effect of Ethical Climate: How ‘Just Right’ Levels Drive Service Innovation

Abstract Eliciting employees’ service innovation is crucial for service firms to meet diverse customer needs, foster customer loyalty, and enhance competitiveness. Although ethical climate is often presumed to facilitate service innovation, its influence may not be uniformly positive. Excessive ethical pressure can suppress innovative behavior, suggesting a curvilinear relationship that warrants further investigation. Drawing on social learning theory and behavioral plasticity theory, this study proposed and tested a multilevel model examining the curvilinear effect of ethical climate on service innovation. Two independent studies were conducted using paired data from the Chinese hospitality industry (Study 1) and the Chinese high-tech service industry (Study 2). Results from both studies revealed that ethical climate had a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship with service innovation. Ethical climate was positively related to ethical efficacy, which in turn exhibited a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship with service innovation. Ethical efficacy mediated the curvilinear association between ethical climate and service innovation. Additionally, openness moderated the curvilinear relationship between ethical climate and service innovation. Although openness moderated the linear impact of ethical climate on ethical efficacy in Study 1, this moderating effect was not observed in Study 2. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed accordingly.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Ethics
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-026-06278-9
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Goldilocks Effect of Ethical Climate: How ‘Just Right’ Levels Drive Service Innovation

Michael Muchiri, Nicola McNeil, Mingjun Yang, Tuan Trong Luu et al.
Journal of Business Ethics
Ethics in Business and Education
article

The Goldilocks Effect of Ethical Climate: How ‘Just Right’ Levels Drive Service Innovation

Michael Muchiri, Nicola McNeil, Mingjun Yang, Tuan Trong Luu, Giang Hoang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Eliciting employees’ service innovation is crucial for service firms to meet diverse customer needs, foster customer loyalty, and enhance competitiveness. Although ethical climate is often presumed to facilitate service innovation, its influence may not be uniformly positive. Excessive ethical pressure can suppress innovative behavior, suggesting a curvilinear relationship that warrants further investigation. Drawing on social learning theory and behavioral plasticity theory, this study proposed and tested a multilevel model examining the curvilinear effect of ethical climate on service innovation. Two independent studies were conducted using paired data from the Chinese hospitality industry (Study 1) and the Chinese high-tech service industry (Study 2). Results from both studies revealed that ethical climate had a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship with service innovation. Ethical climate was positively related to ethical efficacy, which in turn exhibited a curvilinear (inverted U-shaped) relationship with service innovation. Ethical efficacy mediated the curvilinear association between ethical climate and service innovation. Additionally, openness moderated the curvilinear relationship between ethical climate and service innovation. Although openness moderated the linear impact of ethical climate on ethical efficacy in Study 1, this moderating effect was not observed in Study 2. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed accordingly.

Journal of Business Ethics
Alfaisal University (SA), RMIT Vietnam (VN), Swinburne University of Technology (AU), RMIT University (AU), Sunway University (MY)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.