Navigating the intersection of global trade and climate action: assessing the compatibility of CORSIA with international trade law for sustainable aviation

Purpose The study aims to assess the legal compatibility of Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, addressing gaps in the existing literature by systematically analyzing trade law implications of its carbon offset mechanisms, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) mandates and differentiated obligations. It proposes reforms to reconcile climate action with equitable trade governance. Design/methodology/approach This interdisciplinary study uses textual analysis of WTO agreements and CORSIA resolutions, conceptual interpretation of trade-climate norms and comparative case analysis. A novel legal–policy interface framework evaluates CORSIA’s governance against WTO principles, supplemented by a Trade Restrictiveness Index (TRI) to quantify compliance cost disparities. Findings CORSIA’s exemptions for least-developed countries and their credit eligibility criteria risk violating WTO nondiscrimination principles. SAF mandates may breach the Technical Barriers to Trade and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreements. Ambiguities in baseline adjustments and certification standards threaten market fragmentation. Reforms include harmonized SAF standards, capacity-building for carbon credit producers and transitional exemptions aligned with WTO jurisprudence. Practical implications Policymakers must align CORSIA’s exemption frameworks with WTO equity principles, adopt technology-neutral SAF standards and establish multilateral carbon credit equivalency mechanisms. Institutional reforms, such as ICAO–WTO joint committees, can preempt trade disputes while advancing aviation decarbonization. Social implications Balancing climate urgency with developing states’ economic growth needs is critical. Equitable access to SAF technologies and carbon markets can mitigate Global North–South disparities, fostering inclusive multilateralism in green transitions. Originality/value This study pioneers a systematic legal analysis of CORSIA-WTO interactions, introducing a novel framework and TRI. It bridges climate governance and trade law scholarship, offering actionable reforms to strengthen the coherence of sustainable aviation policies within the rules-based trading system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jitlp-04-2025-0033
Primary Topic
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the intersection of global trade and climate action: assessing the compatibility of CORSIA with international trade law for sustainable aviation

Zihan Chen
Journal of International Trade Law and Policy
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
article

Navigating the intersection of global trade and climate action: assessing the compatibility of CORSIA with international trade law for sustainable aviation

Zihan Chen
article en

Abstract

Purpose The study aims to assess the legal compatibility of Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) with World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, addressing gaps in the existing literature by systematically analyzing trade law implications of its carbon offset mechanisms, sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) mandates and differentiated obligations. It proposes reforms to reconcile climate action with equitable trade governance. Design/methodology/approach This interdisciplinary study uses textual analysis of WTO agreements and CORSIA resolutions, conceptual interpretation of trade-climate norms and comparative case analysis. A novel legal–policy interface framework evaluates CORSIA’s governance against WTO principles, supplemented by a Trade Restrictiveness Index (TRI) to quantify compliance cost disparities. Findings CORSIA’s exemptions for least-developed countries and their credit eligibility criteria risk violating WTO nondiscrimination principles. SAF mandates may breach the Technical Barriers to Trade and Subsidies and Countervailing Measures Agreements. Ambiguities in baseline adjustments and certification standards threaten market fragmentation. Reforms include harmonized SAF standards, capacity-building for carbon credit producers and transitional exemptions aligned with WTO jurisprudence. Practical implications Policymakers must align CORSIA’s exemption frameworks with WTO equity principles, adopt technology-neutral SAF standards and establish multilateral carbon credit equivalency mechanisms. Institutional reforms, such as ICAO–WTO joint committees, can preempt trade disputes while advancing aviation decarbonization. Social implications Balancing climate urgency with developing states’ economic growth needs is critical. Equitable access to SAF technologies and carbon markets can mitigate Global North–South disparities, fostering inclusive multilateralism in green transitions. Originality/value This study pioneers a systematic legal analysis of CORSIA-WTO interactions, introducing a novel framework and TRI. It bridges climate governance and trade law scholarship, offering actionable reforms to strengthen the coherence of sustainable aviation policies within the rules-based trading system.

Journal of International Trade Law and Policy
Tsinghua University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.