Thinking Classrooms in Graduate Engineering Education: A Pedagogical Framework for Autonomy and Problem-Solving

Innovative pedagogies that nurture higher-order competencies such as autonomy and problem-solving are critical in graduate STEM contexts. This study conceptualizes Thinking Classrooms as a pedagogical framework for graduate engineering education and examines how classroom practices associated with this approach support the development of autonomous learning and complex problem-solving. Drawing on classroom-based evidence collected over multiple academic cohorts in a master’s program in mechanical engineering, we describe patterns of student engagement, instructor adaptations, and evolving learning behaviors. Our findings highlight the potential of Thinking Classroom principles to inform instructional design, foster learner agency, and strengthen disciplinary problem-solving practices in postgraduate engineering education. We discuss implications for curriculum development and future research directions in STEM education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16020350
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thinking Classrooms in Graduate Engineering Education: A Pedagogical Framework for Autonomy and Problem-Solving

Francisco Romero-Sánchez, Rafael Agujetas Ortiz, Francisco Javier Alonso Sánchez, Gonzalo Alonso-Pinto
Education Sciences
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Thinking Classrooms in Graduate Engineering Education: A Pedagogical Framework for Autonomy and Problem-Solving

Francisco Romero-Sánchez, Rafael Agujetas Ortiz, Francisco Javier Alonso Sánchez, Gonzalo Alonso-Pinto
article en

Abstract

Innovative pedagogies that nurture higher-order competencies such as autonomy and problem-solving are critical in graduate STEM contexts. This study conceptualizes Thinking Classrooms as a pedagogical framework for graduate engineering education and examines how classroom practices associated with this approach support the development of autonomous learning and complex problem-solving. Drawing on classroom-based evidence collected over multiple academic cohorts in a master’s program in mechanical engineering, we describe patterns of student engagement, instructor adaptations, and evolving learning behaviors. Our findings highlight the potential of Thinking Classroom principles to inform instructional design, foster learner agency, and strengthen disciplinary problem-solving practices in postgraduate engineering education. We discuss implications for curriculum development and future research directions in STEM education.

Education SciencesVol. 16(2)
Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Castilla y León (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.