Development and Exploratory Validation of the Clinical Research Nursing Competencies-Self-Efficacy Scale

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Clinical Research Nursing Competencies-Self-Efficacy (Se-CRN) scale, a theory-grounded instrument to assess perceived capability in clinical research nursing practice. <b>Methods</b>: A two-phase validation study was conducted using an exploratory sequential mixed-method design between July 2022 and September 2025. The initial item pool was derived from an established competency taxonomy and refined through expert review for face and content validity. The final version of the Se-CRN was administered online to Clinical Research Nurses working with patients enrolled in clinical trials in Italy. Structural validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis with parallel analysis, and reliability was assessed through internal consistency and hierarchical indices. Group differences in self-efficacy were examined across clinical settings, educational levels, and research experience. <b>Results</b>: A total of 183 nurses participated. The data supported a five-factor solution reflecting core dimensions of clinical research nursing (Clinical Practice, Study Management, Human Subject Protection, Contributing to the Science, and Care Coordination and Continuity). Reliability was excellent at the scale level and strong across domains. No differences in perceived capability were observed between oncological and non-oncological settings. Higher self-efficacy was consistently associated with greater experience in the research setting and, to a lesser extent, with advanced education. <b>Conclusions</b>: The Se-CRN is the first validated self-efficacy instrument that captures the full scope of clinical research nursing practice. It provides a practical measure to support training needs assessment, curriculum development, and workforce planning. Further research should confirm the factor structure and examine responsiveness to professional development across diverse settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14040551
Primary Topic
Health Sciences Research and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Exploratory Validation of the Clinical Research Nursing Competencies-Self-Efficacy Scale

Gianluca Conte, Monica Guberti, Mattia Bozzetti, Laura Apadula et al.
Healthcare
Health Sciences Research and Education
article

Development and Exploratory Validation of the Clinical Research Nursing Competencies-Self-Efficacy Scale

Gianluca Conte, Monica Guberti, Mattia Bozzetti, Laura Apadula, Giulia Villa, Rosario Caruso, Arianna Magon, Daniele Napolitano
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: The objective of this study was to develop and validate the Clinical Research Nursing Competencies-Self-Efficacy (Se-CRN) scale, a theory-grounded instrument to assess perceived capability in clinical research nursing practice. <b>Methods</b>: A two-phase validation study was conducted using an exploratory sequential mixed-method design between July 2022 and September 2025. The initial item pool was derived from an established competency taxonomy and refined through expert review for face and content validity. The final version of the Se-CRN was administered online to Clinical Research Nurses working with patients enrolled in clinical trials in Italy. Structural validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis with parallel analysis, and reliability was assessed through internal consistency and hierarchical indices. Group differences in self-efficacy were examined across clinical settings, educational levels, and research experience. <b>Results</b>: A total of 183 nurses participated. The data supported a five-factor solution reflecting core dimensions of clinical research nursing (Clinical Practice, Study Management, Human Subject Protection, Contributing to the Science, and Care Coordination and Continuity). Reliability was excellent at the scale level and strong across domains. No differences in perceived capability were observed between oncological and non-oncological settings. Higher self-efficacy was consistently associated with greater experience in the research setting and, to a lesser extent, with advanced education. <b>Conclusions</b>: The Se-CRN is the first validated self-efficacy instrument that captures the full scope of clinical research nursing practice. It provides a practical measure to support training needs assessment, curriculum development, and workforce planning. Further research should confirm the factor structure and examine responsiveness to professional development across diverse settings.

HealthcareVol. 14(4)
University of Rome Tor Vergata (IT), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), University of Milan (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), MultiMedica (IT), IRCCS Policlinico San Donato (IT), Orthopedic Institute (US), Pancreas Centre (Canada) (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Health Sciences Research and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.