Action-Quality rating systems in indoor volleyball: A scoping review of conceptual frameworks, analytical approaches, and positional applications

Objective This scoping review aimed to systematically map and categorise action-quality rating systems used to evaluate individual skill execution in indoor volleyball, with practical relevance for performance analysts supporting elite-level athletes such as the New Zealand VolleyFerns. Methods Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus. Eligible studies included those that developed, applied, or evaluated rating systems for technical skill execution in indoor volleyball from 2000 to 2024. Forty-four studies were included after structured screening and data extraction using CADIMA. Rating systems were classified by typology, analytical approach, application context, and positional specificity. Results Three typological categories emerged: ordinal-descriptive systems (64%), interval-probabilistic models (9%), and hybrid-emergent frameworks (27%). Analytical approaches ranged from basic descriptive statistics to probabilistic modelling, social network analysis, and machine learning. Most studies focused on elite-level female athletes and emphasised terminal actions (e.g., serve, attack), with growing attention to contextual and positional variation. Setter and libero actions were increasingly analysed through system-sensitive models reflecting match phase and tactical role. Conclusion Volleyball action-quality rating systems have evolved from static ordinal scales to complex, context-sensitive frameworks that better capture the dynamic relationship between skill execution and match context. However, challenges such as methodological heterogeneity, inconsistent terminology, and limited validation persist. This review provides foundational insights for developing robust, role-specific, and analytically sound rating systems to inform coaching and talent identification in elite volleyball.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541261415737
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Action-Quality rating systems in indoor volleyball: A scoping review of conceptual frameworks, analytical approaches, and positional applications

Kirsten Spencer, Zeljko L Labit
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Action-Quality rating systems in indoor volleyball: A scoping review of conceptual frameworks, analytical approaches, and positional applications

Kirsten Spencer, Zeljko L Labit
article en

Abstract

Objective This scoping review aimed to systematically map and categorise action-quality rating systems used to evaluate individual skill execution in indoor volleyball, with practical relevance for performance analysts supporting elite-level athletes such as the New Zealand VolleyFerns. Methods Following the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and Scopus. Eligible studies included those that developed, applied, or evaluated rating systems for technical skill execution in indoor volleyball from 2000 to 2024. Forty-four studies were included after structured screening and data extraction using CADIMA. Rating systems were classified by typology, analytical approach, application context, and positional specificity. Results Three typological categories emerged: ordinal-descriptive systems (64%), interval-probabilistic models (9%), and hybrid-emergent frameworks (27%). Analytical approaches ranged from basic descriptive statistics to probabilistic modelling, social network analysis, and machine learning. Most studies focused on elite-level female athletes and emphasised terminal actions (e.g., serve, attack), with growing attention to contextual and positional variation. Setter and libero actions were increasingly analysed through system-sensitive models reflecting match phase and tactical role. Conclusion Volleyball action-quality rating systems have evolved from static ordinal scales to complex, context-sensitive frameworks that better capture the dynamic relationship between skill execution and match context. However, challenges such as methodological heterogeneity, inconsistent terminology, and limited validation persist. This review provides foundational insights for developing robust, role-specific, and analytically sound rating systems to inform coaching and talent identification in elite volleyball.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.