Public employment programmes in the EU during the Great Recession: lessons for a European Job Guarantee

Abstract Minsky’s proposal for a Job Guarantee (JG) as a strategy for full employment dates back to 1986. It is based on public employment programmes (PEPs), which have been utilized to address long-term unemployment during major economic crises in the USA and Europe since the 1930s, including the recent Great Recession. PEPs are multi-purpose tools whose objectives and design are not necessarily based on Minsky’s theoretical arguments and principles for a JG, such as universal coverage or voluntary participation. During the Great Recession, the design of PEPs in the EU was largely influenced by the “activation approach” to labour market policy, which had been promoted by the European Employment Strategy (EES) since its ratification by the Amsterdam Treaty of the EU in 1997. However, several experiments with JG programmes have also been conducted in various EU Member States in recent years. This has led some post-Keynesian economists and the European Trade Union Confederation to advocate for the establishment of a European JG aimed at eliminating long-term unemployment across the EU. The article first discusses the functions of PEP under alternative theoretical and policy frameworks, expanding in more detail Minsky’s JG proposal and the “activation paradigm” of labour market policy. It then examines the variety of goals and rationales of the PEPs implemented in the EU during the Great Recession. Finally, it delves into the recent experiences of JG programmes in Greece and France to draw lessons for the design of a European JG, as the countercyclical component of the EES.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Evolutionary Political Economy
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43253-026-00173-9
Primary Topic
Social Policy and Reform Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public employment programmes in the EU during the Great Recession: lessons for a European Job Guarantee

Maria T. Karamessini
Review of Evolutionary Political Economy
Social Policy and Reform Studies
article

Public employment programmes in the EU during the Great Recession: lessons for a European Job Guarantee

Maria T. Karamessini
article en

Abstract

Abstract Minsky’s proposal for a Job Guarantee (JG) as a strategy for full employment dates back to 1986. It is based on public employment programmes (PEPs), which have been utilized to address long-term unemployment during major economic crises in the USA and Europe since the 1930s, including the recent Great Recession. PEPs are multi-purpose tools whose objectives and design are not necessarily based on Minsky’s theoretical arguments and principles for a JG, such as universal coverage or voluntary participation. During the Great Recession, the design of PEPs in the EU was largely influenced by the “activation approach” to labour market policy, which had been promoted by the European Employment Strategy (EES) since its ratification by the Amsterdam Treaty of the EU in 1997. However, several experiments with JG programmes have also been conducted in various EU Member States in recent years. This has led some post-Keynesian economists and the European Trade Union Confederation to advocate for the establishment of a European JG aimed at eliminating long-term unemployment across the EU. The article first discusses the functions of PEP under alternative theoretical and policy frameworks, expanding in more detail Minsky’s JG proposal and the “activation paradigm” of labour market policy. It then examines the variety of goals and rationales of the PEPs implemented in the EU during the Great Recession. Finally, it delves into the recent experiences of JG programmes in Greece and France to draw lessons for the design of a European JG, as the countercyclical component of the EES.

Review of Evolutionary Political EconomyVol. 7(1)
Panteion University (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Social Policy and Reform Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.