Subjective interpretation of ICG-FA in reconstructive surgery: Perception versus perfusion
These findings demonstrate substantial interobserver variability in subjective ICG-FA interpretation and highlight the difficulty of visually identifying venous outflow disturbances and subtle perfusion abnormalities. Quantitative ICG-FA may help address these limitations.
Authors
- Matthijs Botman (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3231-2482)
- Caroline Driessen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8395-527X)
- Pieter J. Tanis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-3310)
- Tine Engberg Damsgaard
- Aselya E.M.M. Weck
- Lasse W.P. van t’ Hof
Institutions
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Dutch Cancer Society (NL)
- Odense University Hospital (DK)
- Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL)
- Region of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
- Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
- Published
- 2026-02-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2026.02.044
- Primary Topic
- Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00