Challenges and Opportunities in Medical Education: Insights from a Narrative Comparison of an American and a Spanish Medical School

This article adopts a focused comparative perspective on two medical schools to illuminate shared strengths and systemic challenges across educational and regulatory contexts. Undergraduate medical education at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (USA) and the Universidad Miguel Hernández (Spain) is analyzed, highlighting common strengths, including solid biomedical foundations, early clinical exposure, and the growing adoption of competency-based approaches. Despite these assets, both institutions face convergent challenges, including rigid curricula, faculty constraints, and difficulties sustaining student engagement in active learning, exacerbated by rapid digital transformation. The analysis supports recommendations to increase curricular flexibility and personalized instruction, strengthen student-centered and interprofessional learning, optimize educational technology, and reform assessment toward continuous feedback and the demonstration of clinical competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Medical Education
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ime5010026
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Challenges and Opportunities in Medical Education: Insights from a Narrative Comparison of an American and a Spanish Medical School

Jenna Norton, Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincón, María López-Brotons, Carlos Fernando Valenzuela et al.
International Medical Education
Innovations in Medical Education
article

Challenges and Opportunities in Medical Education: Insights from a Narrative Comparison of an American and a Spanish Medical School

Jenna Norton, Jose-Manuel Ramos-Rincón, María López-Brotons, Carlos Fernando Valenzuela, Sergio Martin-Benlloch
article en

Abstract

This article adopts a focused comparative perspective on two medical schools to illuminate shared strengths and systemic challenges across educational and regulatory contexts. Undergraduate medical education at the University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center (USA) and the Universidad Miguel Hernández (Spain) is analyzed, highlighting common strengths, including solid biomedical foundations, early clinical exposure, and the growing adoption of competency-based approaches. Despite these assets, both institutions face convergent challenges, including rigid curricula, faculty constraints, and difficulties sustaining student engagement in active learning, exacerbated by rapid digital transformation. The analysis supports recommendations to increase curricular flexibility and personalized instruction, strengthen student-centered and interprofessional learning, optimize educational technology, and reform assessment toward continuous feedback and the demonstration of clinical competence.

International Medical EducationVol. 5(1)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), University of New Mexico (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Innovations in Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.