Distinct worldviews determine how meat producers navigate competing sustainability priorities in the United States
Beef, pork and broiler producers face complexities in prioritizing sustainability actions. We use Q methodology to explore diverging patterns in how US producers approach sustainability priorities, even among same-species and same-scale operations, with emphasis on animal well-being and environmental stewardship. Three distinct worldviews emerged: one prioritizing animal welfare, another emphasizing holistic environmental stewardship, and a third focused on balancing business viability with other concerns. Our findings can inform strategies for aligning producer actions and consumer expectations for sustainable meat production.
Authors
- Marie L. Spiker (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-5960)
- Sarah Collier (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8834-5075)
- Jennifer Schmitt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5427-5208)
- Jennifer J. Otten (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0540-3389)
- Jorge Rivera-Gonzalez
- Alan Ismach
- Noah Janzing
- Elizabeth Abraham
- Mary Fudge
Institutions
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Washington (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Food
- Published
- 2026-02-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-026-01300-9
- Primary Topic
- Q Methodology Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture