From likes to trusts: How trust feedback reduces misinformation on social media

By rewarding engagement over accuracy, social media platforms foster the spread of misinformation. Likes and similar engagement reactions are a central form of feedback on most platforms and shape what users share. On the platforms, users quickly learn that sharing interesting, attention-grabbing content garners positive feedback, even when it is inaccurate. With repeated exposure to these social rewards, sharing interesting content—including interesting but inaccurate content—can become a habit. We review evidence for this reward-based learning and propose a simple redesign of platform rewards: adding a Trust button so users can reward accurate, reliable posts. Experimental evidence supports this approach: Users give Trusts to accurate posts more than inaccurate posts. Then, when they receive trust feedback, users increasingly share accurate content (even when less interesting) and reduce sharing of inaccurate but highly interesting posts. Because this intervention changes incentives, it is scalable, preserves user choice, and aligns with people’s stated goal of sharing accurate information. Misinformation interventions that overlook the role of social media incentives are unlikely to produce lasting results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behavioral Science & Policy
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607261423714
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From likes to trusts: How trust feedback reduces misinformation on social media

Gizem Ceylan, Wendy Wood
Behavioral Science & Policy
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

From likes to trusts: How trust feedback reduces misinformation on social media

Gizem Ceylan, Wendy Wood
article en

Abstract

By rewarding engagement over accuracy, social media platforms foster the spread of misinformation. Likes and similar engagement reactions are a central form of feedback on most platforms and shape what users share. On the platforms, users quickly learn that sharing interesting, attention-grabbing content garners positive feedback, even when it is inaccurate. With repeated exposure to these social rewards, sharing interesting content—including interesting but inaccurate content—can become a habit. We review evidence for this reward-based learning and propose a simple redesign of platform rewards: adding a Trust button so users can reward accurate, reliable posts. Experimental evidence supports this approach: Users give Trusts to accurate posts more than inaccurate posts. Then, when they receive trust feedback, users increasingly share accurate content (even when less interesting) and reduce sharing of inaccurate but highly interesting posts. Because this intervention changes incentives, it is scalable, preserves user choice, and aligns with people’s stated goal of sharing accurate information. Misinformation interventions that overlook the role of social media incentives are unlikely to produce lasting results.

Behavioral Science & Policy
University of Southern California (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.