Estimating Original Topography of Zones Affected by Debris-flows Using Geometric Continuity

Quantifying debris-flow damage requires an estimation of the pre-event topography. However, acquisition of pre-event topographic data is often limited by the spatiotemporal uncertainty of such events. To address the limitation, this study proposes a topography estimation method based on geometric continuity and compares its performance with those of a Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based approach and ordinary kriging. Using a pre-event LiDAR digital elevation model (DEM) as a reference, the proposed model yielded the lowest global mean absolute error of approximately 0.943 m across the entire extent of the debris-flow. Statistical errors (MAE and RMSE) were evaluated, and shape similarity was assessed using dynamic time warping (DTW) for 30 randomly extracted cross sections. The proposed model achieved the lowest average MAE of 0.544 m, RMSE of 0.685 m, and DTW distance of 5.078 m. Although the GMM-based model and kriging showed locally superior accuracy in some sections, the proposed model exhibited a higher estimation capability at the global scale. This implies that topography estimation accuracy is not determined solely by the algorithmic characteristics of a single model, and that model performance may vary depending on geomorphic conditions. Nevertheless, the proposed model provides a structurally stable estimation of the debris-flow-impacted topography and has potential applicability to similar disaster-induced landforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9798/kosham.2026.26.1.97
Primary Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimating Original Topography of Zones Affected by Debris-flows Using Geometric Continuity

Dong-Geun Kim, Sukhee Yoon, Jongseo Lee, Choongshik Woo et al.
Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
Landslides and related hazards
article

Estimating Original Topography of Zones Affected by Debris-flows Using Geometric Continuity

Dong-Geun Kim, Sukhee Yoon, Jongseo Lee, Choongshik Woo, Donghyun Kim, Kwangyoun Lee
article en

Abstract

Quantifying debris-flow damage requires an estimation of the pre-event topography. However, acquisition of pre-event topographic data is often limited by the spatiotemporal uncertainty of such events. To address the limitation, this study proposes a topography estimation method based on geometric continuity and compares its performance with those of a Gaussian mixture model (GMM)-based approach and ordinary kriging. Using a pre-event LiDAR digital elevation model (DEM) as a reference, the proposed model yielded the lowest global mean absolute error of approximately 0.943 m across the entire extent of the debris-flow. Statistical errors (MAE and RMSE) were evaluated, and shape similarity was assessed using dynamic time warping (DTW) for 30 randomly extracted cross sections. The proposed model achieved the lowest average MAE of 0.544 m, RMSE of 0.685 m, and DTW distance of 5.078 m. Although the GMM-based model and kriging showed locally superior accuracy in some sections, the proposed model exhibited a higher estimation capability at the global scale. This implies that topography estimation accuracy is not determined solely by the algorithmic characteristics of a single model, and that model performance may vary depending on geomorphic conditions. Nevertheless, the proposed model provides a structurally stable estimation of the debris-flow-impacted topography and has potential applicability to similar disaster-induced landforms.

Korean Society of Hazard MitigationVol. 26(1)
École Française d'Extrême-Orient (FR), KPMG (United Kingdom) (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Landslides and related hazards
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.