From partial to full conversion in English deadjectival nominals

Abstract The literature on noun phrases apparently headed by adjectives such as the rich or the old often focuses on aspects like their semantic interpretations, their constraints (cf. Glass, 2019; Alexiadou, 2021), or their interpretation as one or another type of conversion, typically partial vs. full (Soares Rodrigues, To appear), or syntactic vs. morphological (Iordăchioaia, 2023). However, the extent to which morphologically complex adjectives (e.g., by suffixation of - al , - ed , - ful ) participate in these constructions and their eventual degree of full lexicalisation as nouns has received considerably less attention in the literature. This paper overviews morphologically complex deadjectival nominals that display full conversion, as evidenced by their nominal inflection in the BNC and COCA. Specifically, it explores the profile of the structures where nominal inflection is attested, according to the quantitative data of the structure of the noun phrase and to the realisation of the Determiner system, of frequency, and of distribution according to language variety and register, which are then statistically validated for results using Log-Likelihood (LL) and Chi-Square tests. The results reveal both similarities and differences in usage between - al and - ic derivatives. Both exhibit similar lexicalisation properties as nouns, but they differ in how the Determiner system is formally realised. Some units allow a limited range of combinations (e.g., the definite article and zero Determiner), whereas others prove more open to combination with quantifiers (e.g., ( a ) few , many , several ).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Morphology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11525-026-09456-7
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From partial to full conversion in English deadjectival nominals

María Granados-Serrano
Morphology
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

From partial to full conversion in English deadjectival nominals

María Granados-Serrano
article en

Abstract

Abstract The literature on noun phrases apparently headed by adjectives such as the rich or the old often focuses on aspects like their semantic interpretations, their constraints (cf. Glass, 2019; Alexiadou, 2021), or their interpretation as one or another type of conversion, typically partial vs. full (Soares Rodrigues, To appear), or syntactic vs. morphological (Iordăchioaia, 2023). However, the extent to which morphologically complex adjectives (e.g., by suffixation of - al , - ed , - ful ) participate in these constructions and their eventual degree of full lexicalisation as nouns has received considerably less attention in the literature. This paper overviews morphologically complex deadjectival nominals that display full conversion, as evidenced by their nominal inflection in the BNC and COCA. Specifically, it explores the profile of the structures where nominal inflection is attested, according to the quantitative data of the structure of the noun phrase and to the realisation of the Determiner system, of frequency, and of distribution according to language variety and register, which are then statistically validated for results using Log-Likelihood (LL) and Chi-Square tests. The results reveal both similarities and differences in usage between - al and - ic derivatives. Both exhibit similar lexicalisation properties as nouns, but they differ in how the Determiner system is formally realised. Some units allow a limited range of combinations (e.g., the definite article and zero Determiner), whereas others prove more open to combination with quantifiers (e.g., ( a ) few , many , several ).

MorphologyVol. 36(1)
Universidad de Granada (ES)
Fundación Ramón Areces, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universidad de Granada, European Regional Development Fund
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.