Utility of breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images of the pancreas

Purpose: To determine the best technique for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (FS-T2WI) of the pancreas, in terms of acquisition time and image quality, among conventional respiratory-gated turbo spin echo (RG-TSE), research breath-hold TSE with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-TSE), and research breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-HASTE). Methods: Eighty-seven patients with suspected pancreatic diseases who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between April and May 2022 were evaluated. Sixty-four focal pancreatic lesions > 5 mm were also evaluated. FS-T2WI of the pancreas were acquired with 3-T scanners using RG-TSE, BH-DL-TSE, and BH-DL-HASTE. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated image quality on a 5-point scale. We calculated the pancreas signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Friedman’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were performed to assess differences among the three techniques. Results: The mean acquisition time was 3 min 51 s (95 % confidence interval: 3 min and 37 s – 4 min and 6 s) for RG-TSE, 40 s for BH-DL-TSE, and 20 s for BH-DL-HASTE. BH-DL-HASTE provided the fewest artifacts and the sharpest edges (P < 0.0001), the most conspicuous main pancreatic duct (P = 0.0001 versus RG-TSE and P < 0.0001 versus BH-DL-TSE), and more conspicuous lesions than those in BH-DL-TSE (P = 0.0028). There was no significant difference in the SNR (P = 0.0766). RG-TSE and BH-DL-HASTE provided a higher CNR than BH-DL-TSE (P = 0.0018 and P = 0.0026, respectively). Conclusions: BH-DL-HASTE would be better than RG-TSE and BH-DL-TSE for acquiring FS-T2WI of the pancreas.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Radiology Open
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2026.100740
Primary Topic
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Utility of breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images of the pancreas

Yasuo Adachi, Hayato Hayashihara, Kazuki Oyama, Yasunari Fujinaga et al.
European Journal of Radiology Open
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
article

Utility of breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images of the pancreas

Yasuo Adachi, Hayato Hayashihara, Kazuki Oyama, Yasunari Fujinaga, Yusuke Kanki, Yoshihiro Kito, Katsuya Maruyama, Fumihito Ichinohe, Marcel Dominik Nickel, Tomofumi Nonaka, Akira Yamada
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the best technique for acquiring fat-suppressed T2-weighted images (FS-T2WI) of the pancreas, in terms of acquisition time and image quality, among conventional respiratory-gated turbo spin echo (RG-TSE), research breath-hold TSE with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-TSE), and research breath-hold half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo with deep learning-based reconstruction (BH-DL-HASTE). Methods: Eighty-seven patients with suspected pancreatic diseases who underwent magnetic resonance imaging between April and May 2022 were evaluated. Sixty-four focal pancreatic lesions > 5 mm were also evaluated. FS-T2WI of the pancreas were acquired with 3-T scanners using RG-TSE, BH-DL-TSE, and BH-DL-HASTE. Two radiologists qualitatively evaluated image quality on a 5-point scale. We calculated the pancreas signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and lesion-to-pancreas contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Friedman’s test and Dunn’s multiple comparisons test were performed to assess differences among the three techniques. Results: The mean acquisition time was 3 min 51 s (95 % confidence interval: 3 min and 37 s – 4 min and 6 s) for RG-TSE, 40 s for BH-DL-TSE, and 20 s for BH-DL-HASTE. BH-DL-HASTE provided the fewest artifacts and the sharpest edges (P < 0.0001), the most conspicuous main pancreatic duct (P = 0.0001 versus RG-TSE and P < 0.0001 versus BH-DL-TSE), and more conspicuous lesions than those in BH-DL-TSE (P = 0.0028). There was no significant difference in the SNR (P = 0.0766). RG-TSE and BH-DL-HASTE provided a higher CNR than BH-DL-TSE (P = 0.0018 and P = 0.0026, respectively). Conclusions: BH-DL-HASTE would be better than RG-TSE and BH-DL-TSE for acquiring FS-T2WI of the pancreas.

European Journal of Radiology OpenVol. 16
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.