Tell me what I want to hear: The effects of matching reviews on consumers’ decision making

Knowing online reviews are helpful for consumers’ decision-making, online shopping platforms often utilize review ranking algorithms to put “featured reviews” on top. This practice is supposed to help consumers navigate the vast quantity and varying quality of online reviews. However, it runs the risk of displaying reviews that do not match consumers’ shopping orientations – the preferences for certain product attributes. We investigate the consequences of this mismatch on consumers’ evaluation of review helpfulness and their downstream purchase decision quality. The research reveals the heterogeneous nature of online reviews by conducting topic modeling with an archival dataset. Next, we conduct experiments to examine the (mis)matching effects. We found that consumers see reviews matching their needs to be more helpful. They also make better shopping decisions. The benefit of matched reviews also holds across both positive and negative reviews. The paper offers theoretical contributions by highlighting the importance of matching reviews with consumers’ orientations and calling attention to the unintended consequences of review ranking practices on shopping platforms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information & Management
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2026.104324
Primary Topic
Digital Marketing and Social Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tell me what I want to hear: The effects of matching reviews on consumers’ decision making

Zachary J. Sheffler, Long The Nguyen
Information & Management
Digital Marketing and Social Media
article

Tell me what I want to hear: The effects of matching reviews on consumers’ decision making

Zachary J. Sheffler, Long The Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Knowing online reviews are helpful for consumers’ decision-making, online shopping platforms often utilize review ranking algorithms to put “featured reviews” on top. This practice is supposed to help consumers navigate the vast quantity and varying quality of online reviews. However, it runs the risk of displaying reviews that do not match consumers’ shopping orientations – the preferences for certain product attributes. We investigate the consequences of this mismatch on consumers’ evaluation of review helpfulness and their downstream purchase decision quality. The research reveals the heterogeneous nature of online reviews by conducting topic modeling with an archival dataset. Next, we conduct experiments to examine the (mis)matching effects. We found that consumers see reviews matching their needs to be more helpful. They also make better shopping decisions. The benefit of matched reviews also holds across both positive and negative reviews. The paper offers theoretical contributions by highlighting the importance of matching reviews with consumers’ orientations and calling attention to the unintended consequences of review ranking practices on shopping platforms.

Information & ManagementVol. 63(3)
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US), Washington State University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Digital Marketing and Social Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.