The ErrVarNorm (EVN) index in Case 1 Best–Worst Scaling: Further methodological and data quality investigations

The error variance normalised (ErrVarNorm; EVN) index, introduced by Llobell et al. (2025), measures participant response consistency in Case 1 Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) tasks. In the context of food-related consumer research, this methodology-focused study considered whether EVN was influenced by participants' country of residence (Obj. 1) and its relationship to other data quality metrics and indices (Obj. 2). Responses from over 9500 participants across nine surveys were analysed. Study 1 ( N = 4122) found lower response consistency among participants from China and India than from New Zealand and the UK, while Study 2 ( N = 1084) showed similar performance between Germany and Singapore, suggesting that factors other than country of residence underpinned the observed differences. Supporting this, within-country variation in Study 3 ( N = 4546) was similar in magnitude to between-country variation in Study 1. Participants failing standard quality checks had markedly lower EVN values: speeders averaged 0.18–0.32, compared with 0.71–0.76 for those who were not speeders; flatliners 0.36–0.56 vs. 0.70–0.77, and those failing instructional manipulation checks 0.39–0.45 vs. 0.79–0.83. Study-specific checks yielded similar patterns, with poor-quality open-ended responses averaging 0.42 vs. 0.77 and contradictory answering averaging 0.40 vs. 0.71. Combining multiple checks further increased the mean EVN of retained participants but reduced sample size, highlighting the need to balance quality thresholds with the number of consumers retained for analysis. Given its consistent association with multiple quality indicators, EVN appears to be a valuable proxy for individual-level data quality beyond Case 1 BWS. • Provides insights on EVN index for measuring respondent consistency in Case 1 BWS. • Within-country EVN variation matched between-country differences in magnitude. • Participants failing quality checks (speeding, flatlining, attention) had systematically lower EVN. • EVN serves as an individual-level overall data quality indicator in online surveys.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Quality and Preference
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2026.105892
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ErrVarNorm (EVN) index in Case 1 Best–Worst Scaling: Further methodological and data quality investigations

G.B.H. Andersen, S.R. Jaeger, S.L. Chheang, F. Llobell
Food Quality and Preference
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

The ErrVarNorm (EVN) index in Case 1 Best–Worst Scaling: Further methodological and data quality investigations

G.B.H. Andersen, S.R. Jaeger, S.L. Chheang, F. Llobell
article en

Abstract

The error variance normalised (ErrVarNorm; EVN) index, introduced by Llobell et al. (2025), measures participant response consistency in Case 1 Best–Worst Scaling (BWS) tasks. In the context of food-related consumer research, this methodology-focused study considered whether EVN was influenced by participants' country of residence (Obj. 1) and its relationship to other data quality metrics and indices (Obj. 2). Responses from over 9500 participants across nine surveys were analysed. Study 1 ( N = 4122) found lower response consistency among participants from China and India than from New Zealand and the UK, while Study 2 ( N = 1084) showed similar performance between Germany and Singapore, suggesting that factors other than country of residence underpinned the observed differences. Supporting this, within-country variation in Study 3 ( N = 4546) was similar in magnitude to between-country variation in Study 1. Participants failing standard quality checks had markedly lower EVN values: speeders averaged 0.18–0.32, compared with 0.71–0.76 for those who were not speeders; flatliners 0.36–0.56 vs. 0.70–0.77, and those failing instructional manipulation checks 0.39–0.45 vs. 0.79–0.83. Study-specific checks yielded similar patterns, with poor-quality open-ended responses averaging 0.42 vs. 0.77 and contradictory answering averaging 0.40 vs. 0.71. Combining multiple checks further increased the mean EVN of retained participants but reduced sample size, highlighting the need to balance quality thresholds with the number of consumers retained for analysis. Given its consistent association with multiple quality indicators, EVN appears to be a valuable proxy for individual-level data quality beyond Case 1 BWS. • Provides insights on EVN index for measuring respondent consistency in Case 1 BWS. • Within-country EVN variation matched between-country differences in magnitude. • Participants failing quality checks (speeding, flatlining, attention) had systematically lower EVN. • EVN serves as an individual-level overall data quality indicator in online surveys.

Food Quality and PreferenceVol. 141
Aarhus University (DK), Sensorion (France) (FR), Unitec Institute of Technology (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.