Vulnerable people’s digital good in four life domains: Insights and future recommendations

This article explores vulnerable people’s experiences of the digital and its potential for ‘good’ across four life domains and four digital inclusion levels. Conceptually, it is framed around the notions of the digital good, vulnerability and intersectionality. Methodologically, the study was conducted in 2024 using a social lab framework and the idea of a ‘social lab’ space, in which 19 older people with intersecting vulnerabilities creatively shared insights into their experiences of good aspects of the digital. By combining manual and NVivo-assisted thematic and discourse analysis with visual analysis, we found that the digital good coexists with challenges in the digital domain, and that participants emphasised challenges more than positive experiences in all life domains except education and training. Regarding interventions, they recommended practical assistance, skills training and other support from those with lay knowledge or professional expertise, while discursively placing responsibility for support-seeking on themselves as individual users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261416062
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Vulnerable people’s digital good in four life domains: Insights and future recommendations

Gianfranco Polizzi, Panayiota Tsatsou, Magdalena Brzeska
New Media & Society
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Vulnerable people’s digital good in four life domains: Insights and future recommendations

Gianfranco Polizzi, Panayiota Tsatsou, Magdalena Brzeska
article en

Abstract

This article explores vulnerable people’s experiences of the digital and its potential for ‘good’ across four life domains and four digital inclusion levels. Conceptually, it is framed around the notions of the digital good, vulnerability and intersectionality. Methodologically, the study was conducted in 2024 using a social lab framework and the idea of a ‘social lab’ space, in which 19 older people with intersecting vulnerabilities creatively shared insights into their experiences of good aspects of the digital. By combining manual and NVivo-assisted thematic and discourse analysis with visual analysis, we found that the digital good coexists with challenges in the digital domain, and that participants emphasised challenges more than positive experiences in all life domains except education and training. Regarding interventions, they recommended practical assistance, skills training and other support from those with lay knowledge or professional expertise, while discursively placing responsibility for support-seeking on themselves as individual users.

New Media & Society
Birmingham City University (GB), De Montfort University (GB)
Birmingham City University
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Vulnerable people’s digital good in four life domains: Insights and future recommendations — Gianfranco Polizzi, Panayiota Tsatsou, et al. · New Media & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS