Relativistic Precision Science vs. Existential Risk Mitigation: A Resource Allocation Analysis for Planetary Survival.

This work presents a comprehensive comparative analysis between scientific theories and technological proposals that genuinely contribute to human survival versus those that offer minimal value for extinction risk mitigation. Through systematic examination of off-world colonization — particularly Mars and Moon programs — we demonstrate fundamental physical, logistical, psychological, and economic barriers that render them unsuitable as civilizational insurance strategies. We contrast these with the A.D.A. (Architecture of Survival) Project, a comprehensive Earth-based protected infrastructure system capable of providing immunity against 280+ catalogued extinction threats. The analysis includes cost-benefit comparisons showing 138–750× economic advantage for Earth-based protection, and timeline projections demonstrating that 30–40% of humanity could be protected within 100 years. This is not a confrontational document — it is an invitation for humanity to unite around a practical, logical, and achievable survival strategy for current and future generations. Preliminary Release Notice: This document is a preliminary version shared to ensure public availability of the ideas and analyses presented. Our small research team has worked extensively on these materials, and a revised version with corrected LaTeX formulas, improved formatting, and additional refinements is expected within the coming months. Due to technical limitations in the current draft, some mathematical expressions may not render correctly. We consider it important to make this information publicly accessible as soon as possible to prevent potential loss and to encourage early discussion and feedback. A fully revised version will be uploaded to replace or supplement this release when available. The authors retain full rights to revise and expand this work. This work is released in good faith for archival purposes and to establish a timestamped public record of the concepts presented. A chapter of: Survival Architecture: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=epWgEQAAQBAJ The origin of the universe: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17948685 Galactic Rejuvenation through SMBH Mergers: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18319226 Deep Impacts of Asteroids or Comets: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18204600 Part of the information from the PDFs of my project: www.humansp.org https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1089-9023

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18741495
Primary Topic
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Relativistic Precision Science vs. Existential Risk Mitigation: A Resource Allocation Analysis for Planetary Survival.

David Felipe Diaz Luna, Raquel Esther Diaz Luna, Alejandro Diaz Aldana
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
article

Relativistic Precision Science vs. Existential Risk Mitigation: A Resource Allocation Analysis for Planetary Survival.

David Felipe Diaz Luna, Raquel Esther Diaz Luna, Alejandro Diaz Aldana
article en

Abstract

This work presents a comprehensive comparative analysis between scientific theories and technological proposals that genuinely contribute to human survival versus those that offer minimal value for extinction risk mitigation. Through systematic examination of off-world colonization — particularly Mars and Moon programs — we demonstrate fundamental physical, logistical, psychological, and economic barriers that render them unsuitable as civilizational insurance strategies. We contrast these with the A.D.A. (Architecture of Survival) Project, a comprehensive Earth-based protected infrastructure system capable of providing immunity against 280+ catalogued extinction threats. The analysis includes cost-benefit comparisons showing 138–750× economic advantage for Earth-based protection, and timeline projections demonstrating that 30–40% of humanity could be protected within 100 years. This is not a confrontational document — it is an invitation for humanity to unite around a practical, logical, and achievable survival strategy for current and future generations. Preliminary Release Notice: This document is a preliminary version shared to ensure public availability of the ideas and analyses presented. Our small research team has worked extensively on these materials, and a revised version with corrected LaTeX formulas, improved formatting, and additional refinements is expected within the coming months. Due to technical limitations in the current draft, some mathematical expressions may not render correctly. We consider it important to make this information publicly accessible as soon as possible to prevent potential loss and to encourage early discussion and feedback. A fully revised version will be uploaded to replace or supplement this release when available. The authors retain full rights to revise and expand this work. This work is released in good faith for archival purposes and to establish a timestamped public record of the concepts presented. A chapter of: Survival Architecture: https://play.google.com/store/books/details?id=epWgEQAAQBAJ The origin of the universe: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17948685 Galactic Rejuvenation through SMBH Mergers: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18319226 Deep Impacts of Asteroids or Comets: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18204600 Part of the information from the PDFs of my project: www.humansp.org https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1089-9023

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.