Using the phenomenology of retrieval failures to understand curiosity for inaccessible and unavailable knowledge

Curiosity arises from metacognitive evaluations of existing knowledge and drives information-seeking behaviors. Past research examining curiosity when retrieval fails used measures of confidence, Feeling-of-Knowing, and Tip-of-the-Tongue states (Brooks et al., 2021; Dubey & Griffiths, 2020; Metcalfe et al., 2017). The present study examines curiosity for irretrievable information by employing phenomenological states of memory failures (Umanath et al., 2025). Participants answered general knowledge questions and selected a phenomenological category to represent any retrieval failure experience, choosing among four categories from "It's on the tip of my tongue" (closest to potential retrieval) to "I have never known or seen this information" (furthest from retrieval). They then rated their curiosity to see the answer for each question. Consistent with the Proximity to Retrieval Success framework (Umanath et al., 2025), curiosity was higher for categories closer to retrieval and decreased as perceived proximity to retrieval decreased.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Psychologica
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106508
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the phenomenology of retrieval failures to understand curiosity for inaccessible and unavailable knowledge

Sharda Umanath, A. Lee, Jennifer H. Coane, Minghua Zhang
Acta Psychologica
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

Using the phenomenology of retrieval failures to understand curiosity for inaccessible and unavailable knowledge

Sharda Umanath, A. Lee, Jennifer H. Coane, Minghua Zhang
article en

Abstract

Curiosity arises from metacognitive evaluations of existing knowledge and drives information-seeking behaviors. Past research examining curiosity when retrieval fails used measures of confidence, Feeling-of-Knowing, and Tip-of-the-Tongue states (Brooks et al., 2021; Dubey & Griffiths, 2020; Metcalfe et al., 2017). The present study examines curiosity for irretrievable information by employing phenomenological states of memory failures (Umanath et al., 2025). Participants answered general knowledge questions and selected a phenomenological category to represent any retrieval failure experience, choosing among four categories from "It's on the tip of my tongue" (closest to potential retrieval) to "I have never known or seen this information" (furthest from retrieval). They then rated their curiosity to see the answer for each question. Consistent with the Proximity to Retrieval Success framework (Umanath et al., 2025), curiosity was higher for categories closer to retrieval and decreased as perceived proximity to retrieval decreased.

Acta PsychologicaVol. 264
Claremont McKenna College (US), Colby College (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.