The Use of Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Exploring Novel Approaches and Emerging Therapies

With modern risk stratification of multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy protocols, we now cure the majority of patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, patients with high-risk features or relapsed disease continue to have suboptimal outcomes. Conventional chemotherapy agents may increase long term organ toxicities even in more favorable patients. Improved understanding of the molecular characteristics of pediatric ALL has led to the preclinical and clinical development of more targeted and less systemically toxic therapeutic options for patients with ALL. Agents such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel and several others have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory ALL by either directing therapies locally to leukemic cells or by targeting specific leukemogenic pathways. Here we present current evidence for efficacy and toxicity profiles for these targeted therapies in pediatric patients with ALL. Many of these strategies have been more comprehensively studied in the adult population and we will highlight ongoing and needed clinical trials in pediatrics. We need to overcome our historically delayed approach to introducing new therapeutic options in pediatrics, as adults often benefit from innovations for years before they are evaluated in children. More proactively incorporating these emerging treatments into frontline therapy for the most vulnerable, high-risk pediatric ALL populations could meaningfully reshape our treatment paradigm. Earlier collaboration for development of clinical trials across pediatric and adult ALL may facilitate more rapid access to promising agents. We anticipate that successful upfront integration of more targeted approaches will improve response rates, reduce reliance on highly toxic chemotherapies and ultimately increase the likelihood of duration of remission. We expect the next generation of clinical trials will credential more targeted therapies for use in frontline therapy with the goal of improved outcomes with minimized toxicity for all patients with pediatric ALL, not just those with more favorable disease characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11864-025-01376-8
Primary Topic
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Use of Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Exploring Novel Approaches and Emerging Therapies

Lisa M Niswander, David J. Byrwa, Marissa Krieger, Kara M. Kelly
Current Treatment Options in Oncology
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
article

The Use of Targeted Therapy in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Exploring Novel Approaches and Emerging Therapies

Lisa M Niswander, David J. Byrwa, Marissa Krieger, Kara M. Kelly
article en

Abstract

With modern risk stratification of multi-agent cytotoxic chemotherapy protocols, we now cure the majority of patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). However, patients with high-risk features or relapsed disease continue to have suboptimal outcomes. Conventional chemotherapy agents may increase long term organ toxicities even in more favorable patients. Improved understanding of the molecular characteristics of pediatric ALL has led to the preclinical and clinical development of more targeted and less systemically toxic therapeutic options for patients with ALL. Agents such as blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, tisagenlecleucel and several others have revolutionized the treatment of relapsed or refractory ALL by either directing therapies locally to leukemic cells or by targeting specific leukemogenic pathways. Here we present current evidence for efficacy and toxicity profiles for these targeted therapies in pediatric patients with ALL. Many of these strategies have been more comprehensively studied in the adult population and we will highlight ongoing and needed clinical trials in pediatrics. We need to overcome our historically delayed approach to introducing new therapeutic options in pediatrics, as adults often benefit from innovations for years before they are evaluated in children. More proactively incorporating these emerging treatments into frontline therapy for the most vulnerable, high-risk pediatric ALL populations could meaningfully reshape our treatment paradigm. Earlier collaboration for development of clinical trials across pediatric and adult ALL may facilitate more rapid access to promising agents. We anticipate that successful upfront integration of more targeted approaches will improve response rates, reduce reliance on highly toxic chemotherapies and ultimately increase the likelihood of duration of remission. We expect the next generation of clinical trials will credential more targeted therapies for use in frontline therapy with the goal of improved outcomes with minimized toxicity for all patients with pediatric ALL, not just those with more favorable disease characteristics.

Current Treatment Options in OncologyVol. 27(1)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Jacobs Institute (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.