Běžící a stojící „nyní“ v Boethiově představě času a věčnosti

The paper analyses two parallel passages, De sancta trinitate 4 (Moreschini 175,231–176,248) and Philosophiae consolatio V (Prosa 6,4–14), devoted by Boethius (d. 524/525) to time, sempiternity (sempiternitas or perpetuitas) as the infinite time of the world, and God’s eternity (aeternitas) understood as an unchanging and unextended “now” in which everything is at once equally present. The distinction between divine eternity and the infinite time of the world, known to Augustine (whom Boethius follows in many ways), was elaborated in the later Neo-Platonic tradition (e.g. Proclus), which equally might have influenced Boethius. The idea of two kinds of the present (praesentia), eternal and temporal, in Boethius’ account from the Philosophiae consolatio corresponds to two kinds of “now” (nunc) in his treatise De sancta trinitate. Among Boethius’s Christian predecessors, this last idea has an analogue especially in Marius Victorinus, whom Boethius followed in his work as a translator and commentator of ancient writings on Aristotelian logic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
REFLEXE
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/25337637.2026.6
Primary Topic
Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Běžící a stojící „nyní“ v Boethiově představě času a věčnosti

Lenka Karfíková
REFLEXE
Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
article

Běžící a stojící „nyní“ v Boethiově představě času a věčnosti

Lenka Karfíková
article en

Abstract

The paper analyses two parallel passages, De sancta trinitate 4 (Moreschini 175,231–176,248) and Philosophiae consolatio V (Prosa 6,4–14), devoted by Boethius (d. 524/525) to time, sempiternity (sempiternitas or perpetuitas) as the infinite time of the world, and God’s eternity (aeternitas) understood as an unchanging and unextended “now” in which everything is at once equally present. The distinction between divine eternity and the infinite time of the world, known to Augustine (whom Boethius follows in many ways), was elaborated in the later Neo-Platonic tradition (e.g. Proclus), which equally might have influenced Boethius. The idea of two kinds of the present (praesentia), eternal and temporal, in Boethius’ account from the Philosophiae consolatio corresponds to two kinds of “now” (nunc) in his treatise De sancta trinitate. Among Boethius’s Christian predecessors, this last idea has an analogue especially in Marius Victorinus, whom Boethius followed in his work as a translator and commentator of ancient writings on Aristotelian logic.

REFLEXEVol. 2025(69)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Religious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.