Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research

In ecology, causal questions are ubiquitous, yet the literature describing systematic approaches to answering these questions is vast and fragmented across different traditions (e.g., randomization, structural equation modeling, convergent cross mapping). In our Perspective, we connect the causal assumptions, tasks, frameworks, and methods across these traditions, thereby providing a synthesis of the concepts and methodological advances for detecting and quantifying causal relationships in ecological systems. Through a newly developed workflow, we emphasize how ecologists' choices among empirical approaches are guided by the pre-existing knowledge that ecologists have and the causal assumptions that ecologists are willing to make.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69878-z
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.83

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research

2 citations
Nature Communications
Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
21.83
article

Best practices for moving from correlation to causation in ecological research

article en
2 citations

Abstract

In ecology, causal questions are ubiquitous, yet the literature describing systematic approaches to answering these questions is vast and fragmented across different traditions (e.g., randomization, structural equation modeling, convergent cross mapping). In our Perspective, we connect the causal assumptions, tasks, frameworks, and methods across these traditions, thereby providing a synthesis of the concepts and methodological advances for detecting and quantifying causal relationships in ecological systems. Through a newly developed workflow, we emphasize how ecologists' choices among empirical approaches are guided by the pre-existing knowledge that ecologists have and the causal assumptions that ecologists are willing to make.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 17(1)
University of Minnesota (US), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (US), Université de Sherbrooke (CA), Johns Hopkins University (US), Scripps Institution of Oceanography (US), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Potsdam (DE), University of Toronto (CA), University of Colorado Boulder (US), George Washington University (US), University of North Dakota (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), University of California San Diego (US), Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Johns Hopkins University, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sustainability and Ecological Systems Analysis
21.83
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.