Contact Unmodified Antisense DNA Biotechnology (CUADb)-Based Oligonucleotide Insecticides and RNA Biocontrols: Molecular Bases and Potential in Plant Protection

Recent advances in molecular genetics, nucleic acid synthesis, and bioinformatics have provided novel opportunities for plants' protection against insect pests. Currently, both DNA and RNA serve as active insecticidal ingredients, transcending their traditional role as carriers of genetic information. This novel activity is achieved through two fundamentally distinct mechanisms. The first one is DNA containment (DNAc), employing oligonucleotide insecticides based on contact unmodified antisense DNA biotechnology (CUADb), also known as 'genetic zipper' technology. The second one is RNA interference (RNAi), employing RNA biocontrols based on double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) technology. The investigation of the molecular mechanism underlying the antisense activity of nucleic acids emerged in the early 1960s. While the antisense effects of RNA in gene silencing through interference (RNAi) was documented in the late 1990s as antiviral immune responses in nematodes, the CUADb antisense approach initially emerged as a powerful strategy for pest control against lepidopterans in 2008. The CUADb approach relies on disrupting rRNA biogenesis and ribosome production, while RNAi shows the best results in mRNA degradation and no efficient result is known for rRNA. The efficacy of these approaches appears to be species dependent. For example, CUADb demonstrates optimal activity against Sternorrhyncha (e.g., aphids, mealybugs, psyllids, and scale insects), thrips, and mites. In turn, the RNAi strategy shows a strong insecticidal potential against beetles from the Tenebrionidae and Chrysomelidae families. Here, we will review the differences between the two technologies, their mechanisms of action and the current challenges facing their adoption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48020235
Primary Topic
Insect Resistance and Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contact Unmodified Antisense DNA Biotechnology (CUADb)-Based Oligonucleotide Insecticides and RNA Biocontrols: Molecular Bases and Potential in Plant Protection

Ilyas Chachoua, Jamin Ali, Vol Oberemok, Kate Laikova et al.
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Insect Resistance and Genetics
article

Contact Unmodified Antisense DNA Biotechnology (CUADb)-Based Oligonucleotide Insecticides and RNA Biocontrols: Molecular Bases and Potential in Plant Protection

Ilyas Chachoua, Jamin Ali, Vol Oberemok, Kate Laikova, Nikita Gal’chinsky
article en

Abstract

Recent advances in molecular genetics, nucleic acid synthesis, and bioinformatics have provided novel opportunities for plants' protection against insect pests. Currently, both DNA and RNA serve as active insecticidal ingredients, transcending their traditional role as carriers of genetic information. This novel activity is achieved through two fundamentally distinct mechanisms. The first one is DNA containment (DNAc), employing oligonucleotide insecticides based on contact unmodified antisense DNA biotechnology (CUADb), also known as 'genetic zipper' technology. The second one is RNA interference (RNAi), employing RNA biocontrols based on double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) technology. The investigation of the molecular mechanism underlying the antisense activity of nucleic acids emerged in the early 1960s. While the antisense effects of RNA in gene silencing through interference (RNAi) was documented in the late 1990s as antiviral immune responses in nematodes, the CUADb antisense approach initially emerged as a powerful strategy for pest control against lepidopterans in 2008. The CUADb approach relies on disrupting rRNA biogenesis and ribosome production, while RNAi shows the best results in mRNA degradation and no efficient result is known for rRNA. The efficacy of these approaches appears to be species dependent. For example, CUADb demonstrates optimal activity against Sternorrhyncha (e.g., aphids, mealybugs, psyllids, and scale insects), thrips, and mites. In turn, the RNAi strategy shows a strong insecticidal potential against beetles from the Tenebrionidae and Chrysomelidae families. Here, we will review the differences between the two technologies, their mechanisms of action and the current challenges facing their adoption.

Current Issues in Molecular BiologyVol. 48(2)
Bilkent University (TR), Jilin Agricultural University (CN), V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Insect Resistance and Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.