KT4D Social Risk Toolkit Module A: AI, free will and autonomy – Individuals' autonomy in their online choices

Navigating online environments involves a continuous stream of small decisions: whether to click, scroll, watch, share, ignore, or disengage. Individually, these choices appear trivial; cumulatively, they shape how attention is allocated, how time is spent, and how preferences and attitudes are reinforced. The sense of autonomy at stake in digital environments does not primarily concern spectacular acts of persuasion, but the ordinary ability to steer one’s actions in line with one’s intentions over time. This chapter examines autonomy as a form of agentive control grounded in attention regulation, goal-directed action, and reflexivity. It explores how algorithmic curation, interface design, and AI-driven personalisation structure the space of possible actions, sometimes facilitating choice and sometimes constraining it. Rather than treating autonomy as an all-or-nothing property, the analysis focuses on the conditions under which digital environments support or undermine individuals’ capacity to remain authors of their own online behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18375190
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KT4D Social Risk Toolkit Module A: AI, free will and autonomy – Individuals' autonomy in their online choices

Tiffany Morisseau
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

KT4D Social Risk Toolkit Module A: AI, free will and autonomy – Individuals' autonomy in their online choices

Tiffany Morisseau
article en

Abstract

Navigating online environments involves a continuous stream of small decisions: whether to click, scroll, watch, share, ignore, or disengage. Individually, these choices appear trivial; cumulatively, they shape how attention is allocated, how time is spent, and how preferences and attitudes are reinforced. The sense of autonomy at stake in digital environments does not primarily concern spectacular acts of persuasion, but the ordinary ability to steer one’s actions in line with one’s intentions over time. This chapter examines autonomy as a form of agentive control grounded in attention regulation, goal-directed action, and reflexivity. It explores how algorithmic curation, interface design, and AI-driven personalisation structure the space of possible actions, sometimes facilitating choice and sometimes constraining it. Rather than treating autonomy as an all-or-nothing property, the analysis focuses on the conditions under which digital environments support or undermine individuals’ capacity to remain authors of their own online behaviour.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.