Children's perceptions of bullying, exclusion and defending in English primary schools: A qualitative study

Bullying in primary school is experienced within peer relationships and classroom norms, yet less is known about how children themselves reason about whether and how to defend others. This study examined pupils’ perceptions and anticipated responses to bullying and exclusion in English primary schools. Thirty-six children (Years 4–5; 18 paired interviews) from two state-maintained and three independent schools participated in semi-structured, activity-based interviews that included a short vignette to support discussion. Working from a realist orientation, data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified. The theme understanding bullying dynamics captured children's recognition of patterned, intentional harm and the emotional consequences for peers. Empathy constrained described how pupils’ willingness to help was shaped by perceived social risk, uncertainty about how to act, and competing pressures. Finally, Moral dimensions of prosocial defence and reciprocity showed that decisions to intervene were filtered through fairness judgements, relational history, and expectations of future reciprocity. Across accounts, children expressed concern for victims but calibrated action to peer hierarchies, safety, and school norms. Findings suggest that defending is a situated moral practice rather than a simple function of empathy. School efforts to promote defending may be strengthened by work on peer norms, visible adult support, and concrete bystander strategies, alongside opportunities for pupils to discuss fairness and responsibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
School Psychology International
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343261422416
Primary Topic
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Children's perceptions of bullying, exclusion and defending in English primary schools: A qualitative study

Aneeza Pervez, Elle Pemberton, Tanvi Masrani
School Psychology International
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
article

Children's perceptions of bullying, exclusion and defending in English primary schools: A qualitative study

Aneeza Pervez, Elle Pemberton, Tanvi Masrani
article en

Abstract

Bullying in primary school is experienced within peer relationships and classroom norms, yet less is known about how children themselves reason about whether and how to defend others. This study examined pupils’ perceptions and anticipated responses to bullying and exclusion in English primary schools. Thirty-six children (Years 4–5; 18 paired interviews) from two state-maintained and three independent schools participated in semi-structured, activity-based interviews that included a short vignette to support discussion. Working from a realist orientation, data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified. The theme understanding bullying dynamics captured children's recognition of patterned, intentional harm and the emotional consequences for peers. Empathy constrained described how pupils’ willingness to help was shaped by perceived social risk, uncertainty about how to act, and competing pressures. Finally, Moral dimensions of prosocial defence and reciprocity showed that decisions to intervene were filtered through fairness judgements, relational history, and expectations of future reciprocity. Across accounts, children expressed concern for victims but calibrated action to peer hierarchies, safety, and school norms. Findings suggest that defending is a situated moral practice rather than a simple function of empathy. School efforts to promote defending may be strengthened by work on peer norms, visible adult support, and concrete bystander strategies, alongside opportunities for pupils to discuss fairness and responsibility.

School Psychology International
University of Nottingham (GB), University of Cambridge (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.