“The Rock is the Community”: Cocreating Social Capital, Nature, and Transcendence in Central Park, NYC

Abstract How do nature and community formation intersect in quintessentially urban New York City? In this ethnographic case study of Central Park, I show that park-based communities act as a rich source of affective social capital in the lives of their members. This sort of social capital is oriented around emotional ties and psychological support between group members, and often crosses demographic lines, distinguishing it from more traditional economic/rational choice and hierarchy reproducing models of social capital. Further, affective social capital and park communities themselves are not purely human creations, but rather the result of a process of cocreation, where humans and beyond human entities (lakes, rocks, landscapes, etc.) together facilitate experiences and interactions that nurture the parks’ social groups, groups that go beyond humanness as a boundary to the social world. To explain these phenomena, I offer a theory of transcendence based on the park’s social context as a “third place,” physical context as a greenspace, and normative/emotional context as a product of communal place-making to explain how park communities bridge demographic gaps and cocreate this affective social capital in collaboration with the natural entities they are enmeshed with.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Qualitative Sociology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-025-09621-0
Primary Topic
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Rock is the Community”: Cocreating Social Capital, Nature, and Transcendence in Central Park, NYC

Taimur Ahmad
Qualitative Sociology
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
article

“The Rock is the Community”: Cocreating Social Capital, Nature, and Transcendence in Central Park, NYC

Taimur Ahmad
article en

Abstract

Abstract How do nature and community formation intersect in quintessentially urban New York City? In this ethnographic case study of Central Park, I show that park-based communities act as a rich source of affective social capital in the lives of their members. This sort of social capital is oriented around emotional ties and psychological support between group members, and often crosses demographic lines, distinguishing it from more traditional economic/rational choice and hierarchy reproducing models of social capital. Further, affective social capital and park communities themselves are not purely human creations, but rather the result of a process of cocreation, where humans and beyond human entities (lakes, rocks, landscapes, etc.) together facilitate experiences and interactions that nurture the parks’ social groups, groups that go beyond humanness as a boundary to the social world. To explain these phenomena, I offer a theory of transcendence based on the park’s social context as a “third place,” physical context as a greenspace, and normative/emotional context as a product of communal place-making to explain how park communities bridge demographic gaps and cocreate this affective social capital in collaboration with the natural entities they are enmeshed with.

Qualitative Sociology
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Place Attachment and Urban Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.