Disability-inclusive iterative workshops as a co-design method: a case study

People with cognitive disability are subject to harm in their daily interactions, such as being ignored, humiliated and disrespected. Our study sought to explore this ‘everyday harm’ empirically. This article presents a case study of the use of disability-inclusive iterative workshops as a co-design method. The workshop method had two key outcomes. First, it confirmed that participants were very familiar with the concept (everyday harm) that the study was researching and naming for the first time. Second, participants advised that the research needed to be strengths-based to ensure the fieldwork was safe for people with cognitive disability and support workers. Conducting the workshops in the project’s early co-design phase allowed the research team to engage with a diversity of participants, discuss suggested revisions in subsequent workshops, and create safe spaces for conflicting voices to respond constructively to the changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDesign
Published
2026-02-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2026.2632234
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disability-inclusive iterative workshops as a co-design method: a case study

Ciara Smyth, Karen Raewyn Fisher, T M Rusin, Jan Idle et al.
CoDesign
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Disability-inclusive iterative workshops as a co-design method: a case study

Ciara Smyth, Karen Raewyn Fisher, T M Rusin, Jan Idle, Sally Robinson
article en

Abstract

People with cognitive disability are subject to harm in their daily interactions, such as being ignored, humiliated and disrespected. Our study sought to explore this ‘everyday harm’ empirically. This article presents a case study of the use of disability-inclusive iterative workshops as a co-design method. The workshop method had two key outcomes. First, it confirmed that participants were very familiar with the concept (everyday harm) that the study was researching and naming for the first time. Second, participants advised that the research needed to be strengths-based to ensure the fieldwork was safe for people with cognitive disability and support workers. Conducting the workshops in the project’s early co-design phase allowed the research team to engage with a diversity of participants, discuss suggested revisions in subsequent workshops, and create safe spaces for conflicting voices to respond constructively to the changes.

CoDesign
Flinders University (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.