Statistical evaluation of nitrogenous oxygen demand as a dominant driver of oxygen dynamics in wastewater treatment plant effluent-impacted watershed

Nitrogenous oxygen demand (NOD) can substantially distort measurements of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), yet its seasonal variability and statistical significance in effluent-receiving rivers remain poorly understood. This study evaluated NOD dynamics in the Yeongsangang and Seomjingang River basins (Korea), using monitoring data from 10 wastewater treatment plants and adjacent river reaches. Water quality parameters (BOD 5 , carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand [CBOD], total organic carbon, total nitrogen [T−N], ammonia-nitrogen [NH 3 −N], nitrite-nitrogen [NO 2 −N], nitrate-nitrogen [NO 3 −N], and dissolved oxygen) and physicochemical drivers (temperature, flow rate, conductivity, and pH) were measured across four seasons. Linear regression analysis indicated that in effluent-responsive (RP) sites, NOD accounted for approximately 60% of the variance in BOD 5 , often comparable to CBOD, while in effluent-resistant (RT) sites, NOD contributions were minimal. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed significant differences between RP and RT sites ( p < 0.05), validating effluent sensitivity as a key determinant of oxygen demand. Pearson correlation and scatterplot analyses were used to identify NH 3 −N and NO 2 −N as strong positive predictors of NOD, while NO 3 −N and T−N were inversely related, reflecting reduced oxygen demand when nitrification was complete. Seasonal factor and redundancy analyses revealed that NOD was amplified in summer by ammonia oxidation and nitrite accumulation, while in winter, oxidized nitrogen species became dominant, with temperature emerging as the most consistent explanatory variable. Overall, the results demonstrate that NOD is a dominant and seasonally dynamic driver of oxygen consumption in effluent-impacted rivers. These findings underscore the need to distinguish between CBOD and NOD in monitoring and regulating to more accurately assess the impacts of effluent and to guide nitrogen management strategies. • Nitrogenous oxygen demand (NOD) identified as a dominant driver of oxygen demand in rivers. • Effluent responsive sites show strong NOD contributions, resistant sites show weak effects. • Seasonal shifts: NH 3 –N, NO 2 –N in summer; NO 3 –N, T–N in winter. • Temperature is the most consistent regulator of NOD variability. • Findings support carbonaceous BOD–NOD separation in monitoring frameworks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2026.104845
Primary Topic
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Statistical evaluation of nitrogenous oxygen demand as a dominant driver of oxygen dynamics in wastewater treatment plant effluent-impacted watershed

Eun-Sik Kim, SooHo Park, Yuri Kim, Jaewoon Jung et al.
Environmental Technology & Innovation
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
article

Statistical evaluation of nitrogenous oxygen demand as a dominant driver of oxygen dynamics in wastewater treatment plant effluent-impacted watershed

Eun-Sik Kim, SooHo Park, Yuri Kim, Jaewoon Jung, Dongho Choi, Daehoon Kim, Sun Hee Cheong
article en

Abstract

Nitrogenous oxygen demand (NOD) can substantially distort measurements of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD 5 ), yet its seasonal variability and statistical significance in effluent-receiving rivers remain poorly understood. This study evaluated NOD dynamics in the Yeongsangang and Seomjingang River basins (Korea), using monitoring data from 10 wastewater treatment plants and adjacent river reaches. Water quality parameters (BOD 5 , carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand [CBOD], total organic carbon, total nitrogen [T−N], ammonia-nitrogen [NH 3 −N], nitrite-nitrogen [NO 2 −N], nitrate-nitrogen [NO 3 −N], and dissolved oxygen) and physicochemical drivers (temperature, flow rate, conductivity, and pH) were measured across four seasons. Linear regression analysis indicated that in effluent-responsive (RP) sites, NOD accounted for approximately 60% of the variance in BOD 5 , often comparable to CBOD, while in effluent-resistant (RT) sites, NOD contributions were minimal. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed significant differences between RP and RT sites ( p < 0.05), validating effluent sensitivity as a key determinant of oxygen demand. Pearson correlation and scatterplot analyses were used to identify NH 3 −N and NO 2 −N as strong positive predictors of NOD, while NO 3 −N and T−N were inversely related, reflecting reduced oxygen demand when nitrification was complete. Seasonal factor and redundancy analyses revealed that NOD was amplified in summer by ammonia oxidation and nitrite accumulation, while in winter, oxidized nitrogen species became dominant, with temperature emerging as the most consistent explanatory variable. Overall, the results demonstrate that NOD is a dominant and seasonally dynamic driver of oxygen consumption in effluent-impacted rivers. These findings underscore the need to distinguish between CBOD and NOD in monitoring and regulating to more accurately assess the impacts of effluent and to guide nitrogen management strategies. • Nitrogenous oxygen demand (NOD) identified as a dominant driver of oxygen demand in rivers. • Effluent responsive sites show strong NOD contributions, resistant sites show weak effects. • Seasonal shifts: NH 3 –N, NO 2 –N in summer; NO 3 –N, T–N in winter. • Temperature is the most consistent regulator of NOD variability. • Findings support carbonaceous BOD–NOD separation in monitoring frameworks.

Environmental Technology & InnovationVol. 41
Chonnam National University (KR), Nature Conservation Centre (TR), Jesus University (KR), Jeonnam Bioindustry Foundation (KR)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.