Optimizing the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Clinical pathways and obstetric complications

The review critically synthesizes existing evidence on optimizing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnostic procedures, focusing on best practices for early detection of at-risk mothers to address related obstetric complications. The review adopts the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic literature reviews and dissemination of study findings. The methodological framework follows three stages: planning, conducting the review, and reporting outcomes. The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) screening criteria were more inclusive than those of other protocols, but no significant differences in maternal outcomes were reported between the protocols. One-step (75-g OGTT) performed relatively accurately compared with two-step screening (50-g GCT plus 75-g OGTT), even though no significant differences were reported, and the two-step screening was the more preferred diagnostic approach among participants. We found no statistically significant difference between early and routine Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests (OGTTs) in pregnancy outcomes. The review findings highlight the significant role of optimized diagnostic approaches in early detection of GDM to minimize the effects on pregnancy and related obstetric outcomes, as well as to reduce the incidence of diabetes mellitus later in life.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3897/jbcr.e183593
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Clinical pathways and obstetric complications

Zlatko Kirovakov, Nadezdha Hinkova, Elitsa Gyokova, А. В. Андреева et al.
Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

Optimizing the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: Clinical pathways and obstetric complications

Zlatko Kirovakov, Nadezdha Hinkova, Elitsa Gyokova, А. В. Андреева, Nikolay Kostadinov
article en

Abstract

The review critically synthesizes existing evidence on optimizing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnostic procedures, focusing on best practices for early detection of at-risk mothers to address related obstetric complications. The review adopts the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines for systematic literature reviews and dissemination of study findings. The methodological framework follows three stages: planning, conducting the review, and reporting outcomes. The International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Group (IADPSG) screening criteria were more inclusive than those of other protocols, but no significant differences in maternal outcomes were reported between the protocols. One-step (75-g OGTT) performed relatively accurately compared with two-step screening (50-g GCT plus 75-g OGTT), even though no significant differences were reported, and the two-step screening was the more preferred diagnostic approach among participants. We found no statistically significant difference between early and routine Oral Glucose Tolerance Tests (OGTTs) in pregnancy outcomes. The review findings highlight the significant role of optimized diagnostic approaches in early detection of GDM to minimize the effects on pregnancy and related obstetric outcomes, as well as to reduce the incidence of diabetes mellitus later in life.

Journal of Biomedical and Clinical ResearchVol. 19
University Hospital St. Marina (BG), Prof. Assen Zlatarov University (BG), Medical University Pleven (BG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.