Neural basis of attentional deployment in affective forecasting of hypothetical medication outcome trade-offs

Predicting the emotional impact of future events, known as affective forecasting, is central to decision-making. When outcomes are emotionally bivalent (i.e. contain mixed-valence elements), such as medical treatments involving both remission and adverse side effects, forecasts are often inaccurate. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural basis of affective forecasting in medical treatment trade-offs and how it is shaped by attentional deployment, an emotion regulation strategy that directs attention toward or away from aspects of an outcome. Participants imagined undergoing a treatment providing pain relief but causing side effects, and forecasted their emotions while focusing on remission or side effects. Univariate analyses showed that attentional deployment modulated neural activity during forecasting: the side-effect-focus condition recruited the insula and frontal pole, whereas remission-focus trials recruited the superior frontal gyrus and frontal pole. Multivariate analyses revealed a broad and distributed network that differentially represented positive and negative forecasting. We conclude that attentional deployment modulates which brain regions are recruited for affective forecasting. We identify the frontal pole as a hub for sustaining emotion-regulation goals during prospective thought. Together, these findings advance models of affective forecasting and highlight potential mechanisms, such as attentional deployment, which may bias emotional predictions in medical trade-off scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2026-01-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhag014
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neural basis of attentional deployment in affective forecasting of hypothetical medication outcome trade-offs

J Harris, Mathieu Petieau, Roxane Victoria Philips, İrem Tuğçe Öz et al.
Cerebral Cortex
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Neural basis of attentional deployment in affective forecasting of hypothetical medication outcome trade-offs

J Harris, Mathieu Petieau, Roxane Victoria Philips, İrem Tuğçe Öz, Chris Baeken, Damien Brevers
article en

Abstract

Predicting the emotional impact of future events, known as affective forecasting, is central to decision-making. When outcomes are emotionally bivalent (i.e. contain mixed-valence elements), such as medical treatments involving both remission and adverse side effects, forecasts are often inaccurate. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate the neural basis of affective forecasting in medical treatment trade-offs and how it is shaped by attentional deployment, an emotion regulation strategy that directs attention toward or away from aspects of an outcome. Participants imagined undergoing a treatment providing pain relief but causing side effects, and forecasted their emotions while focusing on remission or side effects. Univariate analyses showed that attentional deployment modulated neural activity during forecasting: the side-effect-focus condition recruited the insula and frontal pole, whereas remission-focus trials recruited the superior frontal gyrus and frontal pole. Multivariate analyses revealed a broad and distributed network that differentially represented positive and negative forecasting. We conclude that attentional deployment modulates which brain regions are recruited for affective forecasting. We identify the frontal pole as a hub for sustaining emotion-regulation goals during prospective thought. Together, these findings advance models of affective forecasting and highlight potential mechanisms, such as attentional deployment, which may bias emotional predictions in medical trade-off scenarios.

Cerebral CortexVol. 36(2)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Luxembourg (LU), Ghent University Hospital (BE), Ghent University (BE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL), Mathys (Netherlands) (NL), UCLouvain (BE)
Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.