Augmented and virtual reality in dental and oral and maxillofacial surgery education: a systematic review with a taxonomy of training technologies

The use of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in surgical training has increased significantly. Trainees in skill-intensive specialties such as dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) highly depend on treating real life cases under supervision. This old apprentice model is challenged by reduced learning opportunities and patient safety questions. AR and VR training can create alternative learning opportunities and intricate skill acquisition by simulating scenarios, providing real-time feedback and repetitive practice without patient risk. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of AR/VR tools in surgical skills training and provides a clear overview of the available systems. In accordance with the PRISMA-SR guidelines, different databases were searched for studies published between April 2015 and 2025. Different AR and VR tools were assessed from twenty-five RCTs and categorized into three groups: haptic simulators, head-mounted devices, and software platforms. Bias assessment via the RoB-2 tool for randomized trials revealed an overall body of evidence with a low risk of bias. Most studies have shown equal or superior outcomes of AR/VR versus conventional training, particularly in terms of preparation accuracy, diagnostic precision, and learner confidence. A minority reported comparable results without clear advantages. In conclusion, AR/VR technologies show promise for enhancing surgical training, although methodological heterogeneity limits comparability. Further research with long-term RCTs, standardized outcomes and user satisfaction is therefore necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08561-1
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmented and virtual reality in dental and oral and maxillofacial surgery education: a systematic review with a taxonomy of training technologies

Mathias Maes, Robin Willaert, Jasper Deferme Van Gerven, Reinhilde Jacobs
BMC Medical Education
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Augmented and virtual reality in dental and oral and maxillofacial surgery education: a systematic review with a taxonomy of training technologies

Mathias Maes, Robin Willaert, Jasper Deferme Van Gerven, Reinhilde Jacobs
article en

Abstract

The use of augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) in surgical training has increased significantly. Trainees in skill-intensive specialties such as dentistry and oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS) highly depend on treating real life cases under supervision. This old apprentice model is challenged by reduced learning opportunities and patient safety questions. AR and VR training can create alternative learning opportunities and intricate skill acquisition by simulating scenarios, providing real-time feedback and repetitive practice without patient risk. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness and usability of AR/VR tools in surgical skills training and provides a clear overview of the available systems. In accordance with the PRISMA-SR guidelines, different databases were searched for studies published between April 2015 and 2025. Different AR and VR tools were assessed from twenty-five RCTs and categorized into three groups: haptic simulators, head-mounted devices, and software platforms. Bias assessment via the RoB-2 tool for randomized trials revealed an overall body of evidence with a low risk of bias. Most studies have shown equal or superior outcomes of AR/VR versus conventional training, particularly in terms of preparation accuracy, diagnostic precision, and learner confidence. A minority reported comparable results without clear advantages. In conclusion, AR/VR technologies show promise for enhancing surgical training, although methodological heterogeneity limits comparability. Further research with long-term RCTs, standardized outcomes and user satisfaction is therefore necessary.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Karolinska Institutet (SE), KU Leuven (BE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.