“From My Perspective…The Anatomy of a Recall: A Retrospective Review of the Sulzer Recall 25 Years Later”

The 2000 Sulzer Orthopedics recall represents one of the most significant crises in orthopedic history, disrupting the established paradigm of successful total hip arthroplasty outcomes. Surgeons across the United States observed an alarming rise in early post-operative complications, particularly unexplained acetabular component loosening. This irregularity prompted investigations which ultimately identified a manufacturing defect responsible for early failure in thousands of patients. With assistance from personal accounts provided by Mr. David Floyd, the former president of Sulzer Orthopedics, and Dr. Jan Albert Koenig, an orthopedic surgeon directly involved in managing affected patients, this paper aims to re-examine the 2000 Sulzer recall on its 25th anniversary. The crisis created a lasting impact which extended beyond patient morbidity and triggered extensive legal, financial, and regulatory repercussions. The Sulzer recall affected nearly 20,000 patients and their orthopedic surgeons and their respective practices and underscored the criticality of stringent quality control and post-market surveillance in orthopedic device manufacturing. The Sulzer recall set a precedent for future orthopedic implant recalls highlighting the need for industry-wide improvements in regulatory oversight and technological advancements, including electronic medical records and modern monitoring modalities such as artificial intelligence-assisted systems. By analyzing the recall’s causes, response strategies, and long-term implications, this paper highlights crucial lessons for quality assurance, crisis management, and patient safety in the evolving landscapes of orthopedic surgery and medical device manufacturing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.143453
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“From My Perspective…The Anatomy of a Recall: A Retrospective Review of the Sulzer Recall 25 Years Later”

Jan A. Koenig, Chelsea S. Sicat, Charles Catanzaro, Thomas Catanzaro et al.
Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

“From My Perspective…The Anatomy of a Recall: A Retrospective Review of the Sulzer Recall 25 Years Later”

Jan A. Koenig, Chelsea S. Sicat, Charles Catanzaro, Thomas Catanzaro, Brandon Ogilvie, Phillip Spadafora, Samuel Zverev
article en

Abstract

The 2000 Sulzer Orthopedics recall represents one of the most significant crises in orthopedic history, disrupting the established paradigm of successful total hip arthroplasty outcomes. Surgeons across the United States observed an alarming rise in early post-operative complications, particularly unexplained acetabular component loosening. This irregularity prompted investigations which ultimately identified a manufacturing defect responsible for early failure in thousands of patients. With assistance from personal accounts provided by Mr. David Floyd, the former president of Sulzer Orthopedics, and Dr. Jan Albert Koenig, an orthopedic surgeon directly involved in managing affected patients, this paper aims to re-examine the 2000 Sulzer recall on its 25th anniversary. The crisis created a lasting impact which extended beyond patient morbidity and triggered extensive legal, financial, and regulatory repercussions. The Sulzer recall affected nearly 20,000 patients and their orthopedic surgeons and their respective practices and underscored the criticality of stringent quality control and post-market surveillance in orthopedic device manufacturing. The Sulzer recall set a precedent for future orthopedic implant recalls highlighting the need for industry-wide improvements in regulatory oversight and technological advancements, including electronic medical records and modern monitoring modalities such as artificial intelligence-assisted systems. By analyzing the recall’s causes, response strategies, and long-term implications, this paper highlights crucial lessons for quality assurance, crisis management, and patient safety in the evolving landscapes of orthopedic surgery and medical device manufacturing.

Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & InnovationVol. 6(2)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.