Comparing hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses during six-minute walk and step tests in mild acute COVID-19

The six-minute walking test (6MWT) and six-minute step test (6MST) are valuable tools for assessing functional capacity and predicting outcomes in individuals suffering from mild COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate functional capacity and oxygen uptake ($${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$) during both the 6MWT and 6MST, to examine hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses and identify predictive factors influencing performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). This is a cross-sectional study including adults with mild COVID-19 symptoms within 6 weeks of a positive RT-PCR test. Participants were assessed for anthropometrics, handgrip strength, physical activity levels, pulmonary function, and performance on the 6MWT/6MST. Cardiorespiratory data were collected using a portable gas analyzer. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the two tests, and regression models were used to identify predictive factors for performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ peak (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). Forty volunteers (57% female) participated, with a mean age of 35 ± 12 years and BMI of 27.55 ± 5.66 kg/m2. Mean 6MWT distance was 473 ± 97 m (82 ± 18% predicted) and mean 6MST was 144 ± 27 steps (81 ± 16% predicted). Significant differences were found in hemodynamic responses with the 6MST eliciting higher heart rate (HR; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (SBP; p < 0.001), and ratings of dyspnea and lower limb fatigue on the Borg scale (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). (Regression analyses revealed factors that predicted performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ peak (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) for both tests, with models explaining 46–59% of variance for the 6MST and 12–40% for the 6MWT. The 6MST and 6MWT elicit distinct physiological responses, with the 6MST imposing greater hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses. Pulmonary function and body composition significantly enhance predictive models for functional performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ peak (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) in both tests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41337-1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses during six-minute walk and step tests in mild acute COVID-19

Shane A. Phillips, Renan Shida Marinho, Aldair Darlan Santos-de-Araújo, Daniela Bassi-Dibai et al.
Scientific Reports
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Comparing hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses during six-minute walk and step tests in mild acute COVID-19

Shane A. Phillips, Renan Shida Marinho, Aldair Darlan Santos-de-Araújo, Daniela Bassi-Dibai, Ross Arena, Audrey Borghi-Silva
article en

Abstract

The six-minute walking test (6MWT) and six-minute step test (6MST) are valuable tools for assessing functional capacity and predicting outcomes in individuals suffering from mild COVID-19. This study aims to evaluate functional capacity and oxygen uptake ($${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$) during both the 6MWT and 6MST, to examine hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses and identify predictive factors influencing performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). This is a cross-sectional study including adults with mild COVID-19 symptoms within 6 weeks of a positive RT-PCR test. Participants were assessed for anthropometrics, handgrip strength, physical activity levels, pulmonary function, and performance on the 6MWT/6MST. Cardiorespiratory data were collected using a portable gas analyzer. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare the two tests, and regression models were used to identify predictive factors for performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ peak (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹). Forty volunteers (57% female) participated, with a mean age of 35 ± 12 years and BMI of 27.55 ± 5.66 kg/m2. Mean 6MWT distance was 473 ± 97 m (82 ± 18% predicted) and mean 6MST was 144 ± 27 steps (81 ± 16% predicted). Significant differences were found in hemodynamic responses with the 6MST eliciting higher heart rate (HR; p < 0.001), systolic blood pressure (SBP; p < 0.001), and ratings of dyspnea and lower limb fatigue on the Borg scale (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). (Regression analyses revealed factors that predicted performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ peak (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) for both tests, with models explaining 46–59% of variance for the 6MST and 12–40% for the 6MWT. The 6MST and 6MWT elicit distinct physiological responses, with the 6MST imposing greater hemodynamic and cardiorespiratory responses. Pulmonary function and body composition significantly enhance predictive models for functional performance and $${\dot{\text {V}}}{{\text{O}}_{\text{2}}}$$ peak (mL kg⁻¹ min⁻¹) in both tests.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Universidade Federal de São Carlos (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Paranaense (BR), Health Net (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Universidade Ceuma (BR), HealthPartners (US)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.