AI is turning research into a scientific monoculture
Generative AI deserves scientific attention. But the rush to study it is producing a feedback loop of topical and methodological convergence, flattening scientific imagination and crowding out the pluralism needed to keep research adaptive, resilient, and intellectually generative. The rush to study generative AI is producing a feedback loop of topical and methodological convergence, flattening scientific imagination and crowding out the pluralism needed to keep research adaptive, resilient, and intellectually generative.
Authors
- Cecilie S. Traberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5640-9273)
- Jon Roozenbeek
- Sander van der Linden
Institutions
- Copenhagen Business School (DK)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Psychology
- Published
- 2026-02-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-026-00428-5
- Primary Topic
- Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00