Real-world ocular safety performance of dermatologic laser and intense pulsed light goggles: a clinical safety audit

Effective ocular protection is essential during dermatologic laser and intense pulsed light (IPL) procedures to prevent retinal and corneal injury. Despite widespread clinical use, the real-world safety performance of protective goggles has not been systematically evaluated. To assess the real-world optical density (OD) performance of dermatologic laser and IPL goggles and to identify potential risks associated with inadequate eye protection. Optical density was measured across 350–920 nm using a xenon lamp–based spectrophotometric system for goggles used with IPL, long-pulsed Nd: YAG, Q-switched Nd: YAG, and pulsed dye lasers (PDL). Both new (≤ 1 year of clinical use) and aged (≥ 5 years) goggles were tested. Measured OD values were compared with ANSI Z136.1 maximum permissible exposure (MPE) thresholds. Most wavelength-specific laser goggles met or exceeded labeled OD specifications, providing reliable ocular protection. In contrast, several IPL goggles, including commercially branded models, failed to meet ANSI Z136.1 safety thresholds within portions of the 400–750 nm range. No significant difference in OD performance was observed between new and aged goggles. The measurement system was limited to ≤ 920 nm, and the number of tested goggle models was modest. While laser-specific goggles generally provided adequate protection, several IPL goggles demonstrated insufficient attenuation across clinically relevant wavelengths, posing potential ocular risks. Clinicians should verify wavelength-specific OD performance rather than rely solely on manufacturer labeling. These findings underscore the need for improved regulatory oversight, standardized certification, and increased awareness to ensure durable and consistent ocular protection in dermatologic practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lasers in Medical Science
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-026-04839-y
Primary Topic
Ocular and Laser Science Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-world ocular safety performance of dermatologic laser and intense pulsed light goggles: a clinical safety audit

Siwon Yun, Jongchul Lim, Hei Sung Kim, Hyun Jeong Ju
Lasers in Medical Science
Ocular and Laser Science Research
article

Real-world ocular safety performance of dermatologic laser and intense pulsed light goggles: a clinical safety audit

Siwon Yun, Jongchul Lim, Hei Sung Kim, Hyun Jeong Ju
article en

Abstract

Effective ocular protection is essential during dermatologic laser and intense pulsed light (IPL) procedures to prevent retinal and corneal injury. Despite widespread clinical use, the real-world safety performance of protective goggles has not been systematically evaluated. To assess the real-world optical density (OD) performance of dermatologic laser and IPL goggles and to identify potential risks associated with inadequate eye protection. Optical density was measured across 350–920 nm using a xenon lamp–based spectrophotometric system for goggles used with IPL, long-pulsed Nd: YAG, Q-switched Nd: YAG, and pulsed dye lasers (PDL). Both new (≤ 1 year of clinical use) and aged (≥ 5 years) goggles were tested. Measured OD values were compared with ANSI Z136.1 maximum permissible exposure (MPE) thresholds. Most wavelength-specific laser goggles met or exceeded labeled OD specifications, providing reliable ocular protection. In contrast, several IPL goggles, including commercially branded models, failed to meet ANSI Z136.1 safety thresholds within portions of the 400–750 nm range. No significant difference in OD performance was observed between new and aged goggles. The measurement system was limited to ≤ 920 nm, and the number of tested goggle models was modest. While laser-specific goggles generally provided adequate protection, several IPL goggles demonstrated insufficient attenuation across clinically relevant wavelengths, posing potential ocular risks. Clinicians should verify wavelength-specific OD performance rather than rely solely on manufacturer labeling. These findings underscore the need for improved regulatory oversight, standardized certification, and increased awareness to ensure durable and consistent ocular protection in dermatologic practice.

Lasers in Medical ScienceVol. 41(1)
Chungnam National University (KR), The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St. Mary's Hospital (KR)
National Research Foundation, Korea Health Industry Development Institute, National Research Foundation of Korea, Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Ocular and Laser Science Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.