The Current State of Acute Care Surgery Workforce and Practice Models: A Joint Statement by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, a

Acute care surgery (ACS) is a specialty that includes trauma, emergency general surgery, and surgical critical care. It has become a vital surgical specialty in the United States, providing surgical services, rescue functions, disaster response, and other important services. Despite its key role in patient care and hospital operations, ACS faces challenges to its sustainability. This overview targets readers who wish to understand the structure and scope of ACS and who work with or manage these practices. The goal is to provide an overview of ACS, its current challenges, and suggestions for developing the specialty. This consensus statement was created by the Acute Care Surgery Workforce Workgroup, which includes representatives from various national surgical organizations. The article combines current ACS models, staffing and compensation practices, and institutional value. It relies on expert agreements and national trends. Several key themes are examined. The value of ACS is shown through better patient outcomes, efficiency, cost savings, and support for institutional missions like disaster preparedness and education. Current ACS programs differ significantly in structure, but two main staffing models exist: traditional (historic) and time delineated. Each model has its own advantages and challenges regarding workload, sustainability, and academic involvement. Regardless of the staffing model, most physician compensation often depends on the measurement of work relative value units. However, these do not fully capture the extent and intensity of ACS work. Additional challenges for the specialty include inconsistencies in terminologies, the absence of board certification, and varying compensation standards. Acute care surgery is a crucial specialty that provides significant value to patients, hospitals, and health care systems. To maintain sustainability and quality, health care leaders need to consider the complexities of ACS practice discussed in this article as well as local demands. Staffing and compensation models should be sustainable and optimize for patient care. Recognizing both clinical and nonclinical contributions of ACS surgeons is essential for resilience and further development of the specialty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/xcs.0000000000001835
Primary Topic
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Current State of Acute Care Surgery Workforce and Practice Models: A Joint Statement by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, a

Stephen H. Barnes, Stephanie A. Savage, Galinos Barmparas, Kimberly A. Davis et al.
Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
article

The Current State of Acute Care Surgery Workforce and Practice Models: A Joint Statement by the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma, a

Stephen H. Barnes, Stephanie A. Savage, Galinos Barmparas, Kimberly A. Davis, Amy J. Goldberg, Anne G. Rizzo, R. Shayn Martin, Michael Rotondo, S. Rob Todd, Patrick B. Murphy, Ben L. Zarzaur, Eileen Bulger, Walter L. Biffl, Mitchell J. Cohen, Kristan L. Staudenmayer, Jason W. Smith, Bellal Joseph, Marc de Moya
article en

Abstract

Acute care surgery (ACS) is a specialty that includes trauma, emergency general surgery, and surgical critical care. It has become a vital surgical specialty in the United States, providing surgical services, rescue functions, disaster response, and other important services. Despite its key role in patient care and hospital operations, ACS faces challenges to its sustainability. This overview targets readers who wish to understand the structure and scope of ACS and who work with or manage these practices. The goal is to provide an overview of ACS, its current challenges, and suggestions for developing the specialty. This consensus statement was created by the Acute Care Surgery Workforce Workgroup, which includes representatives from various national surgical organizations. The article combines current ACS models, staffing and compensation practices, and institutional value. It relies on expert agreements and national trends. Several key themes are examined. The value of ACS is shown through better patient outcomes, efficiency, cost savings, and support for institutional missions like disaster preparedness and education. Current ACS programs differ significantly in structure, but two main staffing models exist: traditional (historic) and time delineated. Each model has its own advantages and challenges regarding workload, sustainability, and academic involvement. Regardless of the staffing model, most physician compensation often depends on the measurement of work relative value units. However, these do not fully capture the extent and intensity of ACS work. Additional challenges for the specialty include inconsistencies in terminologies, the absence of board certification, and varying compensation standards. Acute care surgery is a crucial specialty that provides significant value to patients, hospitals, and health care systems. To maintain sustainability and quality, health care leaders need to consider the complexities of ACS practice discussed in this article as well as local demands. Staffing and compensation models should be sustainable and optimize for patient care. Recognizing both clinical and nonclinical contributions of ACS surgeons is essential for resilience and further development of the specialty.

Journal of the American College of Surgeons
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Arizona (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital (IN), University of Rochester Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), Grady Health System (US), General Department of Preventive Medicine (VN), Scripps Clinic Medical Group (US), Meeting the Challenge (United States) (US), Princeton BioMeditech (United States) (US), Stanford Medicine (US), JK Research (United States) (US), Wake Forest University (US), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.