Consultation complexity and professionals consulted: retrospective cohort in English primary care
Background The Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) launched in England in 2019 to expand the multidisciplinary primary care workforce, but its impact on workload since implementation is unclear. Aim To examine changes in workload complexity associated with ARRS implementation. Design and Setting Longitudinal cohort study used the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) AURUM. We analysed 3,530,628 consultations involving General Practitioners (GPs), nurses, or direct patient care (DPC)-ARRS roles for 420,986 patients from 369 English practices in 2018 and 2021. Methods Multilevel logistic regression assessed associations between 17 patient and consultation complexity factors and being seen by a DPC-ARRS role, adjusting for year, age, sex, region, deprivation, and consultation mode. Results Complex consultations with DPC-ARRS-eligible roles increased from 15.8% in 2018 to 18.8% in 2021. Diagnostically capable ARRS roles were more likely than GPs to conduct the first consultation after diabetes diagnosis (OR=1.4, 95%CI=1.3-1.6) and consultations with ≥2 preventive tasks (OR=5.7, 95%CI=5.5-5.8), but less likely to manage chronic pain (OR=0.9, 95%CI=0.8-1.0), dementia (OR=0.4, 95%CI=0.3-0.4), mental illness (OR=0.4, 95%CI=0.3-0.4), learning disabilities (OR=0.3, 95%CI=0.3-0.4), consultations with ≥3 medicines prescribed (OR=0.6, 95%CI=0.5-0.6), consultations resulted in emergency admission (OR=0.7, 95%CI=0.6-0.9), and consultations with ≥2 diagnoses coded (OR=0.5, 95%CI=0.5-0.5). Patients with interpreter needs (OR=1.2, 95%CI=1.1-1.3), recent homelessness (OR=1.4, 95%CI =1.1-1.7) or ≥3 long-term conditions (OR=1.1, 95%CI=1.1-1.1) were more likely to be seen by diagnostic ARRS staff. Conclusions Following ARRS implementation, primary care activity was delivered by a broader workforce managing increasingly complex care. Further research should assess the safety, quality, and system impacts of ARRS roles.
Authors
- Peter J Edwards (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6999-753X)
- Isobel Ward (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7724-567X)
- Maria Theresa Redaniel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0668-0874)
- Nicola Walsh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0077-3973)
- Jialan Hong
- Ben Bennett
- Mavin Nathan Kashyap
- Chris Salisbury
- Christopher Penfold
- John Macleod
- Hugh Mcleod
Institutions
- University of the West of England (GB)
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- West of England Academic Health Science Network (GB)
- National Cancer Registry (IE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- British Journal of General Practice
- Published
- 2026-02-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2025.0670
- Primary Topic
- Nursing Roles and Practices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Department of Health and Social Care
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West