Efflorescence and strength effects of different ambient regimes of curing fly ash – based geopolymer concrete

This study investigated the effects of different ambient curing regimes, alkali activator composition, and ground granulated blast – furnace slag (GGBS) incorporation, upon the efflorescence deterioration of ambient – cured fly ash – based geopolymer concrete. Two blends of the binary activator comprising sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solutions, made at different silicate moduli of SiO₂/Na₂O = 1.31 and 1.43, were used to prepare fly ash and fly ash – GGBS geopolymer concretes. The curing conditions employed comprised air – tight sealing, water – immersion, and open – air exposure of samples. Efflorescence deterioration was evaluated along with mechanical properties consisting of workability and compressive strength. The occurrence of efflorescence was assessed by conducting qualitative surface observations and quantitative mass measurements, along with analytical characterization of both the effloresced geopolymer concrete and the efflorescence salt that formed. Results showed that mixtures cured under sealed conditions consistently achieved higher compressive strengths and exhibited reduced salt crystallization, whereas air curing led to severe efflorescence deterioration. The lower silicate activator and/or higher GGBS content enhanced strength development, reduced efflorescence severity, and improved microstructural densification. Incorporation of 30–40 % GGBS effectively mitigated efflorescence formation under water – curing of geopolymer concretes. • Sealed – curing effectively mitigated efflorescence due to moisture retention. • Water – curing also suppressed surface efflorescence due to leaching of alkalis. • Air – curing led to most severe efflorescence due to a highly porous matrix. • Slag or low silicate activator enhanced strength and reduced efflorescence under all curing regimes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Building Materials
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2026.145722
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efflorescence and strength effects of different ambient regimes of curing fly ash – based geopolymer concrete

Megan Welman-Purchase, Abdolhossein Naghizadeh, S O Ekolu, Fitsum Solomon et al.
Construction and Building Materials
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Efflorescence and strength effects of different ambient regimes of curing fly ash – based geopolymer concrete

Megan Welman-Purchase, Abdolhossein Naghizadeh, S O Ekolu, Fitsum Solomon, L. Tchadjie, C. Wu
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of different ambient curing regimes, alkali activator composition, and ground granulated blast – furnace slag (GGBS) incorporation, upon the efflorescence deterioration of ambient – cured fly ash – based geopolymer concrete. Two blends of the binary activator comprising sodium silicate and sodium hydroxide solutions, made at different silicate moduli of SiO₂/Na₂O = 1.31 and 1.43, were used to prepare fly ash and fly ash – GGBS geopolymer concretes. The curing conditions employed comprised air – tight sealing, water – immersion, and open – air exposure of samples. Efflorescence deterioration was evaluated along with mechanical properties consisting of workability and compressive strength. The occurrence of efflorescence was assessed by conducting qualitative surface observations and quantitative mass measurements, along with analytical characterization of both the effloresced geopolymer concrete and the efflorescence salt that formed. Results showed that mixtures cured under sealed conditions consistently achieved higher compressive strengths and exhibited reduced salt crystallization, whereas air curing led to severe efflorescence deterioration. The lower silicate activator and/or higher GGBS content enhanced strength development, reduced efflorescence severity, and improved microstructural densification. Incorporation of 30–40 % GGBS effectively mitigated efflorescence formation under water – curing of geopolymer concretes. • Sealed – curing effectively mitigated efflorescence due to moisture retention. • Water – curing also suppressed surface efflorescence due to leaching of alkalis. • Air – curing led to most severe efflorescence due to a highly porous matrix. • Slag or low silicate activator enhanced strength and reduced efflorescence under all curing regimes.

Construction and Building MaterialsVol. 516
University of the Free State (ZA), Zhejiang Ocean University (CN), University College London (GB), Zhejiang University (CN), Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.