Shaping future forests: how can ecophysiology support climate‐smart forest management?

Climate change, particularly the associated increase in extreme events and disturbances, threatens the numerous environmental, social, and economic benefits that forests provide, both locally and globally. Heat and drought pose significant risks to forest ecosystems; the anticipated future climate is expected to exacerbate this trend. Management interventions should aim to maximise the provision of ecological functions amid the uncertain conditions ahead. A better understanding of the mechanisms regulating forest responses to drought, heat, pests, and diseases - and how management interventions interact with these - is necessary for evidence-based, climate-smart forest management. We first provide an overview of the ecophysiological mechanisms that drive the loss of ecosystem functioning induced by heat and drought. We then explore how various commonly adopted management interventions at the stand level - such as tree species selection and mixture, stand density regulation, measures to optimise stand structure, tree height, and age distribution, as well as nutrient management - may positively or negatively influence forest ecophysiological responses to heat and drought. In this work, we present a mechanism-based critical assessment of forest management practices to support climate-smart forestry/forest management in response to shifting environmental and climatic conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71007
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shaping future forests: how can ecophysiology support climate‐smart forest management?

José M. Grünzweig, H Bugmann, Nate G. McDowell, Laura Bigio et al.
New Phytologist
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Shaping future forests: how can ecophysiology support climate‐smart forest management?

José M. Grünzweig, H Bugmann, Nate G. McDowell, Laura Bigio, Philipp Brun, Franck Krumm, Micah Wilhelm, Henrik A. Hartmann, Arun K. Bose, Alessandra Bottero, Pascal Schneider, Anne Kempel, Andreas Rigling, Valentina Vitali, Jürgen Bauhus, J Jelle Lever, Arthur Gessler, Janine Schweier
article en

Abstract

Climate change, particularly the associated increase in extreme events and disturbances, threatens the numerous environmental, social, and economic benefits that forests provide, both locally and globally. Heat and drought pose significant risks to forest ecosystems; the anticipated future climate is expected to exacerbate this trend. Management interventions should aim to maximise the provision of ecological functions amid the uncertain conditions ahead. A better understanding of the mechanisms regulating forest responses to drought, heat, pests, and diseases - and how management interventions interact with these - is necessary for evidence-based, climate-smart forest management. We first provide an overview of the ecophysiological mechanisms that drive the loss of ecosystem functioning induced by heat and drought. We then explore how various commonly adopted management interventions at the stand level - such as tree species selection and mixture, stand density regulation, measures to optimise stand structure, tree height, and age distribution, as well as nutrient management - may positively or negatively influence forest ecophysiological responses to heat and drought. In this work, we present a mechanism-based critical assessment of forest management practices to support climate-smart forestry/forest management in response to shifting environmental and climatic conditions.

New Phytologist
Julius Kühn-Institut (DE), Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US), University of Freiburg (DE), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Committee on Climate Change (GB), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH), Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network (AU), Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies (US), Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry (DE), University of Göttingen (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.