Možnosti a hranice slovenskej pracovnoprávnej súdnej ochrany

The central theme of this scientific article is an attempt to identify the approach of individual judicial authorities to the protection of the weaker party, i.e., the employee, in a special type of court proceedings. The authors seek to answer the fundamental question of whether the adopted Civil Procedure Code, with its special type of court proceedings for individual labor disputes and specific principles designed to favor employees in the protection of their rights, has had the intended effect of redressing the existing factual inequality between employees and employers. Based on an analysis of the legal regulations and the content of court decisions, the authors conclude that the courts have gradually developed different approaches to the application of individual special protective mechanisms, to the extent that the differences between the classic course of court proceedings and court proceedings with protection for the weaker party are beginning to blur.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
AUC IURIDICA
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2026.10
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Možnosti a hranice slovenskej pracovnoprávnej súdnej ochrany

Marek Švec, Andrea Olšovská
AUC IURIDICA
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

Možnosti a hranice slovenskej pracovnoprávnej súdnej ochrany

Marek Švec, Andrea Olšovská
article en

Abstract

The central theme of this scientific article is an attempt to identify the approach of individual judicial authorities to the protection of the weaker party, i.e., the employee, in a special type of court proceedings. The authors seek to answer the fundamental question of whether the adopted Civil Procedure Code, with its special type of court proceedings for individual labor disputes and specific principles designed to favor employees in the protection of their rights, has had the intended effect of redressing the existing factual inequality between employees and employers. Based on an analysis of the legal regulations and the content of court decisions, the authors conclude that the courts have gradually developed different approaches to the application of individual special protective mechanisms, to the extent that the differences between the classic course of court proceedings and court proceedings with protection for the weaker party are beginning to blur.

AUC IURIDICAVol. 72(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.