Contrast-Enhanced Mammography vs. Breast MRI for Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response: A Prospective Clinical Comparison Study

<b>Objective</b>: To compare contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating residual tumor size and pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective study included patients with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer who were scheduled to receive NAC followed by surgery. All patients underwent both CEM and breast MRI before initiation of NAC and within seven days after completion of treatment. Surgery was performed at a median of 14 days after post-treatment imaging. Residual tumor size measurements obtained by both imaging modalities were compared with histopathological findings, which served as the reference standard. Pathological complete response was defined as the absence of residual invasive carcinoma in the surgical specimen. <b>Results</b>: A total of 74 female patients were included. CEM estimated residual tumor size within ±1 cm of histopathology in 84.7% of cases, whereas MRI achieved this accuracy in 76.4%. Agreement with histopathology was higher for CEM than for MRI. In predicting pathological complete response, CEM demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.3%) and negative predictive value compared with MRI; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.24). MRI showed slightly higher specificity. Pathological complete response was observed in 31.1% of patients. <b>Conclusion</b>: Contrast-enhanced mammography demonstrated performance comparable to breast MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with numerically higher sensitivity for predicting pathological complete response. CEM may represent a practical and accessible alternative to MRI, particularly in settings where MRI is unavailable or contraindicated. These findings support the clinical use of CEM as a reliable alternative imaging modality for response assessment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16040640
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography vs. Breast MRI for Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response: A Prospective Clinical Comparison Study

Ömer Acar, Atike Pınar Erdoğan, Çağdaş Rıza Açar, Ferhat Ekinci et al.
Diagnostics
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Contrast-Enhanced Mammography vs. Breast MRI for Assessing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response: A Prospective Clinical Comparison Study

Ömer Acar, Atike Pınar Erdoğan, Çağdaş Rıza Açar, Ferhat Ekinci, Mustafa Sahbazlar, İhsan Sebnem Orguc
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective</b>: To compare contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) with breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating residual tumor size and pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective study included patients with histopathologically confirmed breast cancer who were scheduled to receive NAC followed by surgery. All patients underwent both CEM and breast MRI before initiation of NAC and within seven days after completion of treatment. Surgery was performed at a median of 14 days after post-treatment imaging. Residual tumor size measurements obtained by both imaging modalities were compared with histopathological findings, which served as the reference standard. Pathological complete response was defined as the absence of residual invasive carcinoma in the surgical specimen. <b>Results</b>: A total of 74 female patients were included. CEM estimated residual tumor size within ±1 cm of histopathology in 84.7% of cases, whereas MRI achieved this accuracy in 76.4%. Agreement with histopathology was higher for CEM than for MRI. In predicting pathological complete response, CEM demonstrated higher sensitivity (91.3%) and negative predictive value compared with MRI; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (<i>p</i> = 0.24). MRI showed slightly higher specificity. Pathological complete response was observed in 31.1% of patients. <b>Conclusion</b>: Contrast-enhanced mammography demonstrated performance comparable to breast MRI in assessing response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with numerically higher sensitivity for predicting pathological complete response. CEM may represent a practical and accessible alternative to MRI, particularly in settings where MRI is unavailable or contraindicated. These findings support the clinical use of CEM as a reliable alternative imaging modality for response assessment.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(4)
Manisa Celal Bayar University (TR), Mardin Artuklu University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.