Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Left Accessory Pathways Using Conventional Methods

Abstract Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia due to its proven safety and effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of this treatment for left-sided accessory pathways in 58 consecutive patients with manifest preexcitation who were treated at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje. The procedure duration varied significantly (p<0.05) depending on the localization of accessory pathways along the mitral annulus (anterior 60.0±26.0 min; anterolateral 45.2±28.4 min; lateral 73.9±27.9 min; posterolateral 59.1±25.5 min; posterior 83.1±29.6 min), as did the number of applied radiofrequency pulses (anterior 9.0±4.5; anterolateral 4.3±4.7; lateral 8.1±5.8; posterolateral 4.0±2.9; posterior 8.1±4.2; p<0.05). Fluoroscopy exposure time did not differ significantly (p=0.078). Atrial fibrillation was recorded in 15.5% of patients prior to the procedure. For the ablation of left-sided accessory pathways, the transaortic approach was used significantly more often (74.1%) than the transseptal approach. There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of primary procedural success (100% for anterior and anterolateral, 82.1% for lateral, 100% for posterolateral, and 88.9% for posterior; p=0.672), recurrence rate (10.7% for lateral and 5.5% for posterior; p=0.023), or final success rate, defined as definitive cure (100% for anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral, 94.8% for lateral, and 89.3% for posterior; p=0.421). Despite the increased time and more radiofrequency energy pulses necessary for ablating laterally and posteriorly positioned accessory pathways, the procedure's success rate remained comparable regardless of accessory pathways location along the mitral annulus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EABR. Experimental and Applied Biomedical Research
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/eabr-2025-0017
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Left Accessory Pathways Using Conventional Methods

Miloš Babić, Branko Djurdjevic, Aleksandra Grbović, Sladjana Bozovic et al.
EABR. Experimental and Applied Biomedical Research
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Left Accessory Pathways Using Conventional Methods

Miloš Babić, Branko Djurdjevic, Aleksandra Grbović, Sladjana Bozovic, Ruzica Jurcevic
article en

Abstract

Abstract Radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory pathways is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular reentry tachycardia due to its proven safety and effectiveness. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of this treatment for left-sided accessory pathways in 58 consecutive patients with manifest preexcitation who were treated at the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases Dedinje. The procedure duration varied significantly (p<0.05) depending on the localization of accessory pathways along the mitral annulus (anterior 60.0±26.0 min; anterolateral 45.2±28.4 min; lateral 73.9±27.9 min; posterolateral 59.1±25.5 min; posterior 83.1±29.6 min), as did the number of applied radiofrequency pulses (anterior 9.0±4.5; anterolateral 4.3±4.7; lateral 8.1±5.8; posterolateral 4.0±2.9; posterior 8.1±4.2; p<0.05). Fluoroscopy exposure time did not differ significantly (p=0.078). Atrial fibrillation was recorded in 15.5% of patients prior to the procedure. For the ablation of left-sided accessory pathways, the transaortic approach was used significantly more often (74.1%) than the transseptal approach. There were no significant differences among the groups in terms of primary procedural success (100% for anterior and anterolateral, 82.1% for lateral, 100% for posterolateral, and 88.9% for posterior; p=0.672), recurrence rate (10.7% for lateral and 5.5% for posterior; p=0.023), or final success rate, defined as definitive cure (100% for anterior, anterolateral, and posterolateral, 94.8% for lateral, and 89.3% for posterior; p=0.421). Despite the increased time and more radiofrequency energy pulses necessary for ablating laterally and posteriorly positioned accessory pathways, the procedure's success rate remained comparable regardless of accessory pathways location along the mitral annulus.

EABR. Experimental and Applied Biomedical ResearchVol. 26(3)
Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.