Can Digital Village Construction Boost Rural Households’ Risky Financial Assets Selection? Evidence from Rural China

Rural households’ risky financial asset selection (RFAS) is the foundation of households’ diversified asset allocation, which in turn helps expand their sources of property income. However, rural households rarely participate in risky financial markets due to limited participation access and a lack of financial knowledge and market information. Digital Village Construction (DVC) has brought new opportunities for a change in this phenomenon. This study determines the impact of DVC on RFAS using data on 5593 rural households from the 2020 China Family Panel Studies and County Digital Village Index. The findings show that DVC significantly increases the likelihood, amount, and rate of rural households’ RFAS. However, the impact of DVC varies across its different dimensions. Specifically, the development of digital infrastructure, digital economy, and digital lifestyles each exerts a significant positive effect on RFAS, whereas digital governance does not show a statistically significant impact—likely due to the underdevelopment or inefficiencies of current digital governance platforms. Mechanism analyses reveal that DVC promotes rural households’ RFAS by improving farmers’ access to information and expanding their market participation opportunities, while rural households’ education expenditure and pension income uncertainties weaken this positive effect. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that the impact of DVC on rural households’ RFAS is more pronounced among young families, those with lower education levels, and high-income families. With the projected advancement of digital villages in China, this study offers crucial guidance for implementing policies, such as the Digital Village Construction Guidelines, by guiding rural households toward more rational and inclusive participation in risky financial markets.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16040491
Primary Topic
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Digital Village Construction Boost Rural Households’ Risky Financial Assets Selection? Evidence from Rural China

Haotian Cheng, Jiawei Cheng, John N. Ng’ombe, Shi Zheng
Agriculture
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
article

Can Digital Village Construction Boost Rural Households’ Risky Financial Assets Selection? Evidence from Rural China

Haotian Cheng, Jiawei Cheng, John N. Ng’ombe, Shi Zheng
article en

Abstract

Rural households’ risky financial asset selection (RFAS) is the foundation of households’ diversified asset allocation, which in turn helps expand their sources of property income. However, rural households rarely participate in risky financial markets due to limited participation access and a lack of financial knowledge and market information. Digital Village Construction (DVC) has brought new opportunities for a change in this phenomenon. This study determines the impact of DVC on RFAS using data on 5593 rural households from the 2020 China Family Panel Studies and County Digital Village Index. The findings show that DVC significantly increases the likelihood, amount, and rate of rural households’ RFAS. However, the impact of DVC varies across its different dimensions. Specifically, the development of digital infrastructure, digital economy, and digital lifestyles each exerts a significant positive effect on RFAS, whereas digital governance does not show a statistically significant impact—likely due to the underdevelopment or inefficiencies of current digital governance platforms. Mechanism analyses reveal that DVC promotes rural households’ RFAS by improving farmers’ access to information and expanding their market participation opportunities, while rural households’ education expenditure and pension income uncertainties weaken this positive effect. Heterogeneity analyses suggest that the impact of DVC on rural households’ RFAS is more pronounced among young families, those with lower education levels, and high-income families. With the projected advancement of digital villages in China, this study offers crucial guidance for implementing policies, such as the Digital Village Construction Guidelines, by guiding rural households toward more rational and inclusive participation in risky financial markets.

AgricultureVol. 16(4)
Southwest University (CN), North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University (US), Renmin University of China (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Microfinance and Financial Inclusion
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.