Advanced hypoplastic contact modelling of field tests for tension piles in layered soils

Conventional Coulomb friction models often fail to reproduce the complete non-linear load–displacement response of soil–pile interfaces, particularly during unloading–reloading sequences. Advanced hypoplastic contact formulations address these limitations by capturing pressure dependency (barotropy), density dependency (pyknotropy), and surface roughness effects using the same constitutive parameter set as the surrounding soil continuum. This study presents the first three-dimensional back-analysis of a hypoplastic contact model benchmarked against full-scale tensile load tests on steel H-piles in a complex, 23-layer stratified soil profile. The methodology establishes a physically consistent calibration framework where the interface roughness parameter is derived directly from torsional interface shear tests on pile-specific steel, rather than empirical estimation. These same contact formulations are subsequently applied to simulate the laboratory tests, ensuring consistency between calibration and field-scale prediction. The model accurately reproduces the field response and reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) by 71% relative to the Coulomb model, capturing hysteretic loops that simplified models miss. A parametric sensitivity analysis identifies interface roughness and pile circumference as the dominant capacity drivers, while relative density and in-situ earth pressure exert a moderate influence. The results demonstrate that physically based contact formulations are essential for accurate pile-soil interaction modelling in complex profiles, enabling more reliable and economical foundation design. • First 3D hypoplastic contact model simulation of pile tests in 23-layer soil profile. • Interface roughness calibrated via 3D torsional shear analysis. • Hypoplastic contact reduces prediction error (RMSE) by 71% vs. Coulomb. • Model captures non-linear hysteresis and state-dependent stiffness. • Surface roughness and pile geometry identified as key capacity drivers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Geotechnics
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2026.107997
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advanced hypoplastic contact modelling of field tests for tension piles in layered soils

Diaa Alkateeb, J. Grabe
Computers and Geotechnics
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
article

Advanced hypoplastic contact modelling of field tests for tension piles in layered soils

Diaa Alkateeb, J. Grabe
article en

Abstract

Conventional Coulomb friction models often fail to reproduce the complete non-linear load–displacement response of soil–pile interfaces, particularly during unloading–reloading sequences. Advanced hypoplastic contact formulations address these limitations by capturing pressure dependency (barotropy), density dependency (pyknotropy), and surface roughness effects using the same constitutive parameter set as the surrounding soil continuum. This study presents the first three-dimensional back-analysis of a hypoplastic contact model benchmarked against full-scale tensile load tests on steel H-piles in a complex, 23-layer stratified soil profile. The methodology establishes a physically consistent calibration framework where the interface roughness parameter is derived directly from torsional interface shear tests on pile-specific steel, rather than empirical estimation. These same contact formulations are subsequently applied to simulate the laboratory tests, ensuring consistency between calibration and field-scale prediction. The model accurately reproduces the field response and reduces the root mean square error (RMSE) by 71% relative to the Coulomb model, capturing hysteretic loops that simplified models miss. A parametric sensitivity analysis identifies interface roughness and pile circumference as the dominant capacity drivers, while relative density and in-situ earth pressure exert a moderate influence. The results demonstrate that physically based contact formulations are essential for accurate pile-soil interaction modelling in complex profiles, enabling more reliable and economical foundation design. • First 3D hypoplastic contact model simulation of pile tests in 23-layer soil profile. • Interface roughness calibrated via 3D torsional shear analysis. • Hypoplastic contact reduces prediction error (RMSE) by 71% vs. Coulomb. • Model captures non-linear hysteresis and state-dependent stiffness. • Surface roughness and pile geometry identified as key capacity drivers.

Computers and GeotechnicsVol. 194
Universität Hamburg (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.