Color and translucency changes induced by try-in media in bleach-shade CAD/CAM ceramic discs: an in-vitro study

This study evaluated the optical influence of try-in media (distilled water, glycerin, and commercial try-in pastes) on ultrathin (0.5-mm) CAD/CAM bleach-shade ceramic discs, focusing on CIEDE2000 color difference (ΔE₀₀), translucency parameter (TP₀₀; ΔE₀₀ between white- and black-backed measurements), and device-reported shade outputs across different ceramic systems. Forty-four 0.5-mm CAD/CAM ceramic discs were fabricated from Celtra Duo (BL2-LT, BL3-LT), VITA Suprinity (0M1-HT), and VITA Enamic (0M1-HT). Each specimen was measured over standardized white and black backgrounds using distilled water, glycerin, eight commercial try-in pastes, or no medium (control). Lab* values and VITA Classic/3D-Master shade outputs were recorded with a dental spectrophotometer under D65/2° conditions; a custom jig standardized specimen positioning and probe angulation. Repeated measurements (n = 5) were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Clinical interpretation used ΔE₀₀ perceptibility/acceptability (≈ 0.8/1.8) and translucency thresholds (TPT₀₀=0.62; TAT₀₀=2.62). Relative to the no-media condition, both water and glycerin produced large, clinically perceptible color shifts across all ceramics (mean ΔE₀₀ ≈ 3.2–5.6; p < 0.001), while direct water–glycerin differences were smaller (≈ 0.7–1.6). Translucency responses were material dependent: Celtra groups showed minimal ΔTP₀₀ relative to glycerin (typically |ΔTP₀₀| ≤ ~0.3), Suprinity showed a modest reduction ( ≈ − 1 to − 2), and Enamic exhibited pronounced translucency loss ( ≈ − 5 to − 7), frequently exceeding translucency acceptability (|ΔTP₀₀| ≥ 2.62). Only selected Celtra BL2/BL3 conditions with translucent/light try-in pastes approached ΔE₀₀ acceptability (≤ 1.8) on white backgrounds. Device-reported shade agreement sometimes masked clinically unacceptable differences: 11% of 3D-Master “matches” and 28% of Classic “matches” still corresponded to ΔE₀₀ > 1.8, particularly over black backgrounds. Try-in media are not optically neutral for ultrathin bleach-shade ceramics. Water and glycerin both produced clinically visible color changes, and translucency effects depended strongly on ceramic microstructure, with Enamic showing clinically unacceptable masking. Clinically, shade selection should not rely on device-reported shade matches alone; verification with appropriate try-in media and evaluation over both white and dark conditions using continuous metrics (ΔE₀₀, TP₀₀/ΔTP₀₀) is recommended.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-07972-w
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Color and translucency changes induced by try-in media in bleach-shade CAD/CAM ceramic discs: an in-vitro study

Yazan Hassona, Noor H. Ismail, Othman Sa'deh, Mikel Alrabadi et al.
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

Color and translucency changes induced by try-in media in bleach-shade CAD/CAM ceramic discs: an in-vitro study

Yazan Hassona, Noor H. Ismail, Othman Sa'deh, Mikel Alrabadi, Alaa Al Haddad
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the optical influence of try-in media (distilled water, glycerin, and commercial try-in pastes) on ultrathin (0.5-mm) CAD/CAM bleach-shade ceramic discs, focusing on CIEDE2000 color difference (ΔE₀₀), translucency parameter (TP₀₀; ΔE₀₀ between white- and black-backed measurements), and device-reported shade outputs across different ceramic systems. Forty-four 0.5-mm CAD/CAM ceramic discs were fabricated from Celtra Duo (BL2-LT, BL3-LT), VITA Suprinity (0M1-HT), and VITA Enamic (0M1-HT). Each specimen was measured over standardized white and black backgrounds using distilled water, glycerin, eight commercial try-in pastes, or no medium (control). Lab* values and VITA Classic/3D-Master shade outputs were recorded with a dental spectrophotometer under D65/2° conditions; a custom jig standardized specimen positioning and probe angulation. Repeated measurements (n = 5) were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models. Clinical interpretation used ΔE₀₀ perceptibility/acceptability (≈ 0.8/1.8) and translucency thresholds (TPT₀₀=0.62; TAT₀₀=2.62). Relative to the no-media condition, both water and glycerin produced large, clinically perceptible color shifts across all ceramics (mean ΔE₀₀ ≈ 3.2–5.6; p < 0.001), while direct water–glycerin differences were smaller (≈ 0.7–1.6). Translucency responses were material dependent: Celtra groups showed minimal ΔTP₀₀ relative to glycerin (typically |ΔTP₀₀| ≤ ~0.3), Suprinity showed a modest reduction ( ≈ − 1 to − 2), and Enamic exhibited pronounced translucency loss ( ≈ − 5 to − 7), frequently exceeding translucency acceptability (|ΔTP₀₀| ≥ 2.62). Only selected Celtra BL2/BL3 conditions with translucent/light try-in pastes approached ΔE₀₀ acceptability (≤ 1.8) on white backgrounds. Device-reported shade agreement sometimes masked clinically unacceptable differences: 11% of 3D-Master “matches” and 28% of Classic “matches” still corresponded to ΔE₀₀ > 1.8, particularly over black backgrounds. Try-in media are not optically neutral for ultrathin bleach-shade ceramics. Water and glycerin both produced clinically visible color changes, and translucency effects depended strongly on ceramic microstructure, with Enamic showing clinically unacceptable masking. Clinically, shade selection should not rely on device-reported shade matches alone; verification with appropriate try-in media and evaluation over both white and dark conditions using continuous metrics (ΔE₀₀, TP₀₀/ΔTP₀₀) is recommended.

BMC Oral HealthVol. 26(1)
University of Jordan (JO), Al-Balqa Applied University (JO)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.