Animal models of intrauterine adhesions: narrative review

The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the methods of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) formation in animal models for future enhancement in anti-adhesion therapy research. Studies (published until October 2025) were identified by searching PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Google scholar databases. Of 464 screened records, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Such methods as curettage, excision, chemical and electrothermal injury of endometrium were examined in order to choose the most effective one in intrauterine formation process. We aimed to evaluate which experimental models most closely replicate clinically relevant scenarios in humans, such as post-inflammatory adhesions and adhesions developing after intrauterine interventions. Mechanical injury models, such as endometrial scraping or partial resection, closely replicate adhesions following obstetric and gynecological procedures. Chemical models alone or combined with mechanical trauma, enhance necrosis and fibrosis, resulting in more severe adhesions and making them suitable for studying advanced IUAs and uterine remodeling. Models with dual mechanical–infectious approaches particularly relevant for post-infectious IUAs. Using animal models in research on IUAs provides objective data by ensuring consistent conditions across study groups. This includes controlled housing and uniform animal characteristics such as identical genetic backgrounds, co-morbidities, immune factors, and predisposition to adhesion formation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeud.2026.100155
Primary Topic
Gynecological conditions and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Animal models of intrauterine adhesions: narrative review

Assia Stepanian, Eva D. Nakhapetyan, Evdokiya Zarova, Maria Yurkanova et al.
Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine Disorders
Gynecological conditions and treatments
article

Animal models of intrauterine adhesions: narrative review

Assia Stepanian, Eva D. Nakhapetyan, Evdokiya Zarova, Maria Yurkanova, Laura Pivazyan, Leila Adamyan
article en

Abstract

The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the methods of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) formation in animal models for future enhancement in anti-adhesion therapy research. Studies (published until October 2025) were identified by searching PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Google scholar databases. Of 464 screened records, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Such methods as curettage, excision, chemical and electrothermal injury of endometrium were examined in order to choose the most effective one in intrauterine formation process. We aimed to evaluate which experimental models most closely replicate clinically relevant scenarios in humans, such as post-inflammatory adhesions and adhesions developing after intrauterine interventions. Mechanical injury models, such as endometrial scraping or partial resection, closely replicate adhesions following obstetric and gynecological procedures. Chemical models alone or combined with mechanical trauma, enhance necrosis and fibrosis, resulting in more severe adhesions and making them suitable for studying advanced IUAs and uterine remodeling. Models with dual mechanical–infectious approaches particularly relevant for post-infectious IUAs. Using animal models in research on IUAs provides objective data by ensuring consistent conditions across study groups. This includes controlled housing and uniform animal characteristics such as identical genetic backgrounds, co-morbidities, immune factors, and predisposition to adhesion formation.

Journal of Endometriosis and Uterine DisordersVol. 15
Sechenov University (RU), Russian New University (RU), Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RU), Women’s Health Care (US), National Medical Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology named after Academician V.I.Kulakov of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (RU)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Gynecological conditions and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.