A comparative study of Japanese and Korean onomatopoeia for the expression of sense of smell —Focusing on Onomatopoeia—

Olfaction is one of the most fundamental human senses; however, it is often regarded as difficult to verbalize because of its abstract and subjective nature. Despite their close connection to daily experience, emotion, and cultural perception, linguistic research on olfactory expressions remains relatively limited, particularly in contrastive studies. This study aimed to examine olfactory onomatopoeias in Japanese and Korean individuals from a comparative perspective, focusing on their semantic characteristics and patterns of meaning extension.<br/> Based on dictionary data, previous studies, and authentic examples from newspapers and corpora, this study analyzed how olfactory onomatopoeias are used to express smells and how their meanings extend beyond sensory perception. The analysis revealed that Japanese olfactory onomatopoeias are relatively limited in number and tend to focus on the intensity of olfactory stimulation rather than on qualitative distinctions, such as pleasant or unpleasant smells. In contrast, Korean has a richer inventory of olfactory onomatopoeia, particularly those describing unpleasant odors, and exhibit more diverse patterns of semantic extension.<br/> Furthermore, in both languages, olfactory onomatopoeia frequently extend from sensory meanings to expressions of human emotions, attitudes, personality traits, and evaluative judgments. While positive olfactory expressions tend to have positive figurative meanings, expressions associated with a strong or unpleasant smell are more likely to have negative connotations. However, a notable difference lies in the focus of semantic extension; Japanese primarily emphasizes the intensity of stimulation, whereas Korean highlights qualitative distinctions in smell. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of sensory language and have implications for contrastive linguistics and language education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang University
Published
2026-02-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20404/jscau.2026.02.64.95
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparative study of Japanese and Korean onomatopoeia for the expression of sense of smell —Focusing on Onomatopoeia—

수희 은
Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang University
Multisensory perception and integration
article

A comparative study of Japanese and Korean onomatopoeia for the expression of sense of smell —Focusing on Onomatopoeia—

수희 은
article en

Abstract

Olfaction is one of the most fundamental human senses; however, it is often regarded as difficult to verbalize because of its abstract and subjective nature. Despite their close connection to daily experience, emotion, and cultural perception, linguistic research on olfactory expressions remains relatively limited, particularly in contrastive studies. This study aimed to examine olfactory onomatopoeias in Japanese and Korean individuals from a comparative perspective, focusing on their semantic characteristics and patterns of meaning extension.<br/> Based on dictionary data, previous studies, and authentic examples from newspapers and corpora, this study analyzed how olfactory onomatopoeias are used to express smells and how their meanings extend beyond sensory perception. The analysis revealed that Japanese olfactory onomatopoeias are relatively limited in number and tend to focus on the intensity of olfactory stimulation rather than on qualitative distinctions, such as pleasant or unpleasant smells. In contrast, Korean has a richer inventory of olfactory onomatopoeia, particularly those describing unpleasant odors, and exhibit more diverse patterns of semantic extension.<br/> Furthermore, in both languages, olfactory onomatopoeia frequently extend from sensory meanings to expressions of human emotions, attitudes, personality traits, and evaluative judgments. While positive olfactory expressions tend to have positive figurative meanings, expressions associated with a strong or unpleasant smell are more likely to have negative connotations. However, a notable difference lies in the focus of semantic extension; Japanese primarily emphasizes the intensity of stimulation, whereas Korean highlights qualitative distinctions in smell. These findings contribute to a deeper understanding of sensory language and have implications for contrastive linguistics and language education.

Center for Japanese Studies Chung-ang UniversityVol. 64
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.