Multiple Competition? An Analysis of Thematic Research Clusters on Competition and Higher Education

Competition in higher education is widespread. Its prevalence is accompanied by increasing interrelations between different competitions. This article systematically analyses the as yet underexplored intellectual structure of the international scholarly discussion on competition in higher education, including its relation to science and industry, based on a combination of bibliometric coupling and qualitative content analysis using a database of 2136 articles. We find evidence for a heterarchical intellectual structure dominated by six thematic clusters: ‘global organizational status competition’, ‘innovation and university-industry linkages’, ‘academics' resources in competition’, ‘management of organizational service quality’, ‘social inequalities and organizational status’ and ‘diffusion of student-related financial policies’. Each cluster highlights a different way of framing competition. We find that these framings are loosely coupled and that the interdependency between different competitions is under-analysed. Additionally, we provide an exemplary examination of country-specific patterns of competition discourse and uncover local variants of global competition imaginaries. By means of the concept of multiple competition, we emphasise this interrelatedness and outline propositions to guide further research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Published
2026-01-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-2026021011911
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multiple Competition? An Analysis of Thematic Research Clusters on Competition and Higher Education

Nicolai Götze, Tim Seidenschnur, Georg Krücken, Rick Vogel et al.
Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Multiple Competition? An Analysis of Thematic Research Clusters on Competition and Higher Education

Nicolai Götze, Tim Seidenschnur, Georg Krücken, Rick Vogel, Anna Kosmützky
article en

Abstract

Competition in higher education is widespread. Its prevalence is accompanied by increasing interrelations between different competitions. This article systematically analyses the as yet underexplored intellectual structure of the international scholarly discussion on competition in higher education, including its relation to science and industry, based on a combination of bibliometric coupling and qualitative content analysis using a database of 2136 articles. We find evidence for a heterarchical intellectual structure dominated by six thematic clusters: ‘global organizational status competition’, ‘innovation and university-industry linkages’, ‘academics' resources in competition’, ‘management of organizational service quality’, ‘social inequalities and organizational status’ and ‘diffusion of student-related financial policies’. Each cluster highlights a different way of framing competition. We find that these framings are loosely coupled and that the interdependency between different competitions is under-analysed. Additionally, we provide an exemplary examination of country-specific patterns of competition discourse and uncover local variants of global competition imaginaries. By means of the concept of multiple competition, we emphasise this interrelatedness and outline propositions to guide further research.

Universitätsbibliothek Kassel
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.