Integrating histopathology and immune marker analysis for machine learning-based colorectal cancer prognostics

This study aims to create a machine-learning framework that integrates histopathological imaging, immune marker data, and clinical features to classify tumor types, determine histological grades, and predict survival outcomes in CRC patients. This study analyzed 650 CRC cases, divided into training (520 cases) and testing (130 cases) subsets. Preprocessing involved quality control, color normalization, and selecting tumor regions (tumor center and invasive margins) with uniform dimensions (224 × 224 pixels). Six immune markers (CD3, CD8, CD45RO, PD-1, LAG-3, Tim-3) were selected for their relevance to CRC progression and immune response. A fine-tuned EfficientNet model was used to extract high-dimensional features from the images. These imaging features were combined with clinical data. To refine the dataset, feature selection methods such as PCA, RFE, and LASSO were applied to include only the most relevant variables. Machine learning models (XGBoost, CatBoost, Random Forest) and ensemble models were developed for tumor type and grade prediction. For survival prediction, regression models such as SVR, Random Forest Regressor, and stacking regressors were used. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, AUC, MSE, and the C-index. The evaluation highlighted the value of feature selection and ensemble learning in CRC classification and survival prediction. For tumor type classification, XGBoost with RFE achieved a testing AUC of 86.15% and accuracy of 85.33%, while stacking-based models with RFE performed better, with a testing AUC of 96.73% and accuracy of 96.92%. Histological grade classification followed a similar trend, with stacking-based models achieving a testing AUC of 96.37% and accuracy of 96.92%. In survival prediction, the Stacking Regressor with RFE produced the best results, with testing MSEs of 132.87 for Disease-Free Survival (days) and 115.78 for Survival (days), along with the highest C-index of 0.84 for both tasks. The proposed framework demonstrates the potential of integrating histopathological imaging, immune markers, and machine learning to improve CRC prognosis and enable personalized treatment, setting a benchmark for future computational pathology research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostic Pathology
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13000-026-01754-2
Primary Topic
AI in cancer detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating histopathology and immune marker analysis for machine learning-based colorectal cancer prognostics

M Ghadhanfar Alwan, Waam Mohammed Taher, Suhas Ballal, Mohamed J. Saadh et al.
Diagnostic Pathology
AI in cancer detection
article

Integrating histopathology and immune marker analysis for machine learning-based colorectal cancer prognostics

M Ghadhanfar Alwan, Waam Mohammed Taher, Suhas Ballal, Mohamed J. Saadh, Ali M. Ali Al-Nuaimi, Aziz Kubaev, Karar H. Alfarttoosi, Tamara Nazar Saeed, Bagher Farhood, Mahmood Jasem Jawad, Priya Priyadarshini Nayak, V. Kavitha, Abhayveer Singh
article en

Abstract

This study aims to create a machine-learning framework that integrates histopathological imaging, immune marker data, and clinical features to classify tumor types, determine histological grades, and predict survival outcomes in CRC patients. This study analyzed 650 CRC cases, divided into training (520 cases) and testing (130 cases) subsets. Preprocessing involved quality control, color normalization, and selecting tumor regions (tumor center and invasive margins) with uniform dimensions (224 × 224 pixels). Six immune markers (CD3, CD8, CD45RO, PD-1, LAG-3, Tim-3) were selected for their relevance to CRC progression and immune response. A fine-tuned EfficientNet model was used to extract high-dimensional features from the images. These imaging features were combined with clinical data. To refine the dataset, feature selection methods such as PCA, RFE, and LASSO were applied to include only the most relevant variables. Machine learning models (XGBoost, CatBoost, Random Forest) and ensemble models were developed for tumor type and grade prediction. For survival prediction, regression models such as SVR, Random Forest Regressor, and stacking regressors were used. Model performance was evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, AUC, MSE, and the C-index. The evaluation highlighted the value of feature selection and ensemble learning in CRC classification and survival prediction. For tumor type classification, XGBoost with RFE achieved a testing AUC of 86.15% and accuracy of 85.33%, while stacking-based models with RFE performed better, with a testing AUC of 96.73% and accuracy of 96.92%. Histological grade classification followed a similar trend, with stacking-based models achieving a testing AUC of 96.37% and accuracy of 96.92%. In survival prediction, the Stacking Regressor with RFE produced the best results, with testing MSEs of 132.87 for Disease-Free Survival (days) and 115.78 for Survival (days), along with the highest C-index of 0.84 for both tasks. The proposed framework demonstrates the potential of integrating histopathological imaging, immune markers, and machine learning to improve CRC prognosis and enable personalized treatment, setting a benchmark for future computational pathology research.

Diagnostic PathologyVol. 21(1)
Jain University (IN), University of Mosul (IQ), Siksha O Anusandhan University (IN), Kashan University of Medical Sciences (IR), Thi Qar University (IQ), Ahl Al Bayt University (IQ), Samarkand State Medical Institute (UZ), Institute of Medical Sciences and Sum Hospital (IN), University of Kerbala (IQ), Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology (IN), Al-Farahidi University, Chitkara University (IN), Middle East University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
AI in cancer detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.