Evidence-Anchored Metaprompting for Competitive Epistemic Positioning: A Framework for Capability Assessment Under Evidentiary Constraints in High-Stakes Professional Contexts

A rigorous metaprompt specification that instructs AI systems to conduct evidence-anchored assessments of candidate suitability for competitive technical positions. This framework enforces epistemic discipline through evidence-limitation constraints, distinguishing between "Not Evidenced" and "Absent" capabilities. Includes structured gap analysis, competitive positioning rubrics, and application materials generation pipeline. Compliant with CARP v1.0, CEPM, and Furlow License v2.0. Validated against the requirements of competitive AI safety and intelligence analyst roles; extensible to any high-stakes professional evaluation context requiring evidence-bounded work sample portfolios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18742218
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence-Anchored Metaprompting for Competitive Epistemic Positioning: A Framework for Capability Assessment Under Evidentiary Constraints in High-Stakes Professional Contexts

Ariel J. Furlow
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Evidence-Anchored Metaprompting for Competitive Epistemic Positioning: A Framework for Capability Assessment Under Evidentiary Constraints in High-Stakes Professional Contexts

Ariel J. Furlow
article en

Abstract

A rigorous metaprompt specification that instructs AI systems to conduct evidence-anchored assessments of candidate suitability for competitive technical positions. This framework enforces epistemic discipline through evidence-limitation constraints, distinguishing between "Not Evidenced" and "Absent" capabilities. Includes structured gap analysis, competitive positioning rubrics, and application materials generation pipeline. Compliant with CARP v1.0, CEPM, and Furlow License v2.0. Validated against the requirements of competitive AI safety and intelligence analyst roles; extensible to any high-stakes professional evaluation context requiring evidence-bounded work sample portfolios.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Nova Research Company (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.