A Comparative Analysis of Intraocular Pressure Measurement Across Different Tonometry Methods and Experience Levels
There was notable inter-observer variability in GAT-based IOP measurements between residents and the senior ophthalmologist, exceeding the ±4 mmHg clinical acceptability benchmark. This variability suggests that less experienced observers may not yet have fully developed skills, impacting measurement accuracy. Over time, this range may narrow as experience and proficiency improve. Additionally, clinicians should interpret NCT results with caution-especially in postoperative assessments or when modifying treatment. Cross-checking with GAT and incorporating structured training protocols may enhance measurement consistency.
Authors
- Sadık Altan Özal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0078-1049)
- Hatice Davarcı (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0841-0368)
- Muhammed Tarık Dinçer
- Yusuf Cem Yılmaz
- Şerife Çiloğlu Hayat
Institutions
- State Hospital (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Korean Journal of Ophthalmology
- Published
- 2026-02-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2025.0117
- Primary Topic
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00